Tomorrow (11/5), voting is your fundamental citizen responsibility-VOTE!

Ozzie_Isaac

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

That is a smart kiddo!  The question was which one has the highest pressure at the bottom of the column.

In case you forgot, the pressure exerted by a column of water is given by the formula:

P=ρ⋅g⋅h

where:

P is the pressure at the bottom,

ρ is the density of the water,

g is the acceleration due to gravity, and

h is the height of the water column.

This is high school physics.

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

That is a smart kiddo!  The question was which one has the highest pressure at the bottom of the column.

In case you forgot, the pressure exerted by a column of water is given by the formula:

P=ρ⋅g⋅h

where:

P is the pressure at the bottom,

ρ is the density of the water,

g is the acceleration due to gravity, and

h is the height of the water column.

This is high school physics.

But I thought you spent your days converting kids to liberalism and figured you probably forgot your physics.  I mean your conversion skills are why you get flown all
around the world and wine and dine?

JohnInCarolina

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

That is a smart kiddo!  The question was which one has the highest pressure at the bottom of the column.

In case you forgot, the pressure exerted by a column of water is given by the formula:

P=ρ⋅g⋅h

where:

P is the pressure at the bottom,

ρ is the density of the water,

g is the acceleration due to gravity, and

h is the height of the water column.

This is high school physics.

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

That is a smart kiddo!  The question was which one has the highest pressure at the bottom of the column.

In case you forgot, the pressure exerted by a column of water is given by the formula:

P=ρ⋅g⋅h

where:

P is the pressure at the bottom,

ρ is the density of the water,

g is the acceleration due to gravity, and

h is the height of the water column.

This is high school physics.

But I thought you spent your days converting kids to liberalism and figured you probably forgot your physics.  I mean your conversion skills are why you get flown all
around the world and wine and dine?

Drink some water before you go to bed tonight.  You can thank me in the morning.

Ozzie_Isaac

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

That is a smart kiddo!  The question was which one has the highest pressure at the bottom of the column.

In case you forgot, the pressure exerted by a column of water is given by the formula:

P=ρ⋅g⋅h

where:

P is the pressure at the bottom,

ρ is the density of the water,

g is the acceleration due to gravity, and

h is the height of the water column.

This is high school physics.

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

That is a smart kiddo!  The question was which one has the highest pressure at the bottom of the column.

In case you forgot, the pressure exerted by a column of water is given by the formula:

P=ρ⋅g⋅h

where:

P is the pressure at the bottom,

ρ is the density of the water,

g is the acceleration due to gravity, and

h is the height of the water column.

This is high school physics.

But I thought you spent your days converting kids to liberalism and figured you probably forgot your physics.  I mean your conversion skills are why you get flown all
around the world and wine and dine?

Drink some water before you go to bed tonight.  You can thank me in the morning.

Lol, I am currently watching Idiocracy.  The documentary we didn’t know we needed.

JohnInCarolina

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

That is a smart kiddo!  The question was which one has the highest pressure at the bottom of the column.

In case you forgot, the pressure exerted by a column of water is given by the formula:

P=ρ⋅g⋅h

where:

P is the pressure at the bottom,

ρ is the density of the water,

g is the acceleration due to gravity, and

h is the height of the water column.

This is high school physics.

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

That is a smart kiddo!  The question was which one has the highest pressure at the bottom of the column.

In case you forgot, the pressure exerted by a column of water is given by the formula:

P=ρ⋅g⋅h

where:

P is the pressure at the bottom,

ρ is the density of the water,

g is the acceleration due to gravity, and

h is the height of the water column.

This is high school physics.

But I thought you spent your days converting kids to liberalism and figured you probably forgot your physics.  I mean your conversion skills are why you get flown all
around the world and wine and dine?

Drink some water before you go to bed tonight.  You can thank me in the morning.

Lol, I am currently watching Idiocracy.  The documentary we didn’t know we needed.

My favorite part of that movie is the backstory about why everyone is wearing crocs.

Ozzie_Isaac

Watching it again last night, showed me how much of a genius Mike Judge is.  So many small details going on in the background and set design too.

DoubleEgger

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

That is a smart kiddo!  The question was which one has the highest pressure at the bottom of the column.

In case you forgot, the pressure exerted by a column of water is given by the formula:

P=ρ⋅g⋅h

where:

P is the pressure at the bottom,

ρ is the density of the water,

g is the acceleration due to gravity, and

h is the height of the water column.

This is high school physics.

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

That is a smart kiddo!  The question was which one has the highest pressure at the bottom of the column.

In case you forgot, the pressure exerted by a column of water is given by the formula:

P=ρ⋅g⋅h

where:

P is the pressure at the bottom,

ρ is the density of the water,

g is the acceleration due to gravity, and

h is the height of the water column.

This is high school physics.

But I thought you spent your days converting kids to liberalism and figured you probably forgot your physics.  I mean your conversion skills are why you get flown all
around the world and wine and dine?

Drink some water before you go to bed tonight.  You can thank me in the morning.

Lol, I am currently watching Idiocracy.  The documentary we didn’t know we needed.

My favorite part of that movie is the backstory about why everyone is wearing crocs.

Never underestimate the American public. 

Legume

I keep overestimating us.

DoubleEgger

Legume said:

I keep overestimating us.

Very little surprises me anymore. 

Ozzie_Isaac

DoubleEgger said:

Legume said:

I keep overestimating us.

Very little surprises me anymore. 

In my neck of the woods, all the Harris signs were taken down the night of the election.  All the Trump signs are still up, and some people are adding more.

caliking

Three of the five white/Caucasian households in our subdivision put up Trump signs, and they’re still up. All other households are Vietnamese, African American, Middle Eastern, Indian, Bangladeshi, Chinese. 

Two African American households had Harris yard signs, which came down the 2nd day after the election. 

JohnInCarolina

Ozzie_Isaac said:

DoubleEgger said:

Legume said:

I keep overestimating us.

Very little surprises me anymore. 

In my neck of the woods, all the Harris signs were taken down the night of the election.  All the Trump signs are still up, and some people are adding more.

But it’s not a cult they say.

Legume

Never were many signs in Boulder. 

Canugghead

caliking said:

Three of the five white/Caucasian households in our subdivision put up Trump signs, and they’re still up. All other households are Vietnamese, African American, Middle Eastern, Indian, Bangladeshi, Chinese. 

Two African American households had Harris yard signs, which came down the 2nd day after the election. 

Any update on the bigot that sent you folks the hate mail?

Canugghead

This thread is still up like Trump signs. Perhaps the Buffalo is a Trump fan 

caliking

Canugghead said:

caliking said:

Three of the five white/Caucasian households in our subdivision put up Trump signs, and they’re still up. All other households are Vietnamese, African American, Middle Eastern, Indian, Bangladeshi, Chinese. 

Two African American households had Harris yard signs, which came down the 2nd day after the election. 

Any update on the bigot that sent you folks the hate mail?

Not really. Police couln't find anything. We weren't expecting any breakthroughs. 

JohnInCarolina

Canugghead said:

caliking said:

Three of the five white/Caucasian households in our subdivision put up Trump signs, and they’re still up. All other households are Vietnamese, African American, Middle Eastern, Indian, Bangladeshi, Chinese. 

Two African American households had Harris yard signs, which came down the 2nd day after the election. 

Any update on the bigot that sent you folks the hate mail?

He won an election this week.

JohnInCarolina

billt01

JohnInCarolina said:

billt01 said:

JohnInCarolina said:

billt01 said:

JohnInCarolina said:

billt01 said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Legume said:

BUFFALOMOOSE said:

BUFFALOMOOSE Posts: 377

November 6

Query me this:

In 2020 Trump received 74.2 million votes, Biden allegedly received 81.3 million.

In 2024 Trump currently has 72.1 million and Harris currently has 67.3 million.

What happened to those 14 million "voters" for the Democrats?  And better yet, where are the shortfalls?  Swing states perhaps?

Would LOVE to know the answers

South Buffalo, New York

***UPDATE***

2024:  Trump 74.3 million-Exceeds 2016 and 2020 total
            
           Harris 69.8 million-Still looking for 11.5 million "voters" for the Democrats

You're silly if you're raising the spectre of fraud in 2020 at this point.  Maybe it was just a mistype on your part.

What exactly is the theory of the case here - that Biden/Democrats somehow rigged the 2020 election, but couldn’t figure out how to do it again in 2024?

maybe they put the cart before the horse and let Puerto Rico vote..

The delta between the two elections is just shy of 13 million votes; or simple,r another state or two worth of votes....

I mean, shouldn't everyone want to know where 13 million voters went?

The fact that 100% of the vote hasn't been reported yet and a lower turnout is a far simpler explanation than some massive conspiracy.

Good Lord.  Some of you shouldn't be allowed to operate power tools.  

4% in Nevada and 23% in Arizona doesn't justify the 13 million number.

I hate that I have to waste energy doing math for you, but here we are.

The current total is 142.5 million.  This is with 94% reporting.  So at 100% reporting, we should expect a total number of votes of close to 151.6 Million.

The total in 2024 was close to 155.5 Million.  So basically a 2.5% lower turnout explains the difference.

Where did that 2.5% come from, you're surely scratching your head over right now?  Gee, I don't know - a lack of enthusiasm perhaps?  Or maybe we lost a lot of voting age citizens to something like a global pandemic over the past four years.  Or some combination of the two, plus lots of other things like shifting voting demographics.  Any number of things are vastly simpler than some kind of massive voting conspiracy.  

Let us wait a month for final numbers to come across..your numbers may track..

Yes, I think it would be smart to wait until all the numbers are in before putting our tinfoil hats on and jumping to conclusions.  

John

what are the updated numbers? 

I think we are @ 99 percent now…

JohnInCarolina

billt01 said:

JohnInCarolina said:

billt01 said:

JohnInCarolina said:

billt01 said:

JohnInCarolina said:

billt01 said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Legume said:

BUFFALOMOOSE said:

BUFFALOMOOSE Posts: 377

November 6

Query me this:

In 2020 Trump received 74.2 million votes, Biden allegedly received 81.3 million.

In 2024 Trump currently has 72.1 million and Harris currently has 67.3 million.

What happened to those 14 million "voters" for the Democrats?  And better yet, where are the shortfalls?  Swing states perhaps?

Would LOVE to know the answers

South Buffalo, New York

***UPDATE***

2024:  Trump 74.3 million-Exceeds 2016 and 2020 total
            
           Harris 69.8 million-Still looking for 11.5 million "voters" for the Democrats

You're silly if you're raising the spectre of fraud in 2020 at this point.  Maybe it was just a mistype on your part.

What exactly is the theory of the case here - that Biden/Democrats somehow rigged the 2020 election, but couldn’t figure out how to do it again in 2024?

maybe they put the cart before the horse and let Puerto Rico vote..

The delta between the two elections is just shy of 13 million votes; or simple,r another state or two worth of votes....

I mean, shouldn't everyone want to know where 13 million voters went?

The fact that 100% of the vote hasn't been reported yet and a lower turnout is a far simpler explanation than some massive conspiracy.

Good Lord.  Some of you shouldn't be allowed to operate power tools.  

4% in Nevada and 23% in Arizona doesn't justify the 13 million number.

I hate that I have to waste energy doing math for you, but here we are.

The current total is 142.5 million.  This is with 94% reporting.  So at 100% reporting, we should expect a total number of votes of close to 151.6 Million.

The total in 2024 was close to 155.5 Million.  So basically a 2.5% lower turnout explains the difference.

Where did that 2.5% come from, you're surely scratching your head over right now?  Gee, I don't know - a lack of enthusiasm perhaps?  Or maybe we lost a lot of voting age citizens to something like a global pandemic over the past four years.  Or some combination of the two, plus lots of other things like shifting voting demographics.  Any number of things are vastly simpler than some kind of massive voting conspiracy.  

Let us wait a month for final numbers to come across..your numbers may track..

Yes, I think it would be smart to wait until all the numbers are in before putting our tinfoil hats on and jumping to conclusions.  

John

what are the updated numbers? 

I think we are @ 99 percent now…

JohnInCarolina

The most recent estimate for the final tally of votes I saw, citing the Associated Press, is anticipating that the 2024 popular vote count total will be 700,000 votes smaller than in 2020.  This was posted yesterday.

But yeah, I know, the AP is part of the deep state too...  

Ozzie_Isaac

Something that got lost in the mix, and should make anyone, regardless of affiliation, nervous is the GOP has the Senate, the House, and the Presidency.

I much prefer a mixed bag of yahoos running stuff.  Give one party control of everything is dicey.  It is better for everyone when our government is inefficient and ineffective.

DoubleEgger

Ozzie_Isaac said:

Something that got lost in the mix, and should make anyone, regardless of affiliation, nervous is the GOP has the Senate, the House, the Supreme Court, and the Presidency.

I much prefer a mixed bag of yahoos running stuff.  Give one party control of everything is dicey.  It is better for everyone when our government is inefficient and ineffective.

FTFY 

Ozzie_Isaac

Hopefully the democrats in the senate are ready for filibusters, because that is the only tool in their tool bag now.

JohnInCarolina

Ozzie_Isaac said:

Something that got lost in the mix, and should make anyone, regardless of affiliation, nervous is the GOP has the Senate, the House, and the Presidency.

I much prefer a mixed bag of yahoos running stuff.  Give one party control of everything is dicey.  It is better for everyone when our government is inefficient and ineffective.

Has the House actually been called yet?  Last I checked, there were still 21 races in limbo. 

I realize the trifecta is likely nonetheless.

I share your concerns, but it's worth remembering that the last time they held all three, the only significant thing the GOP did was to pass a massive tax cut for the wealthy that added something like 7 trillion to the debt. This was admittedly not great for the country, but all things considered it could've been a lot worse.  The GOP does not actually have much of a unified agenda for anything else.  

One of the largest checks on efficiency concerns the Senate filibuster.  Most people are expecting the new GOP majority to kill it, but we'll see.  Doing so requires several Senators to effectively forfeit their own power.  There are at least a few with enough independence from Agent Orange that it might be tough to pull off.  

Gulfcoastguy

They were dealing with Romney and McCain, two failed GOP presidential candidates.

billt01

JohnInCarolina said:

The most recent estimate for the final tally of votes I saw, citing the Associated Press, is anticipating that the 2024 popular vote count total will be 700,000 votes smaller than in 2020.  This was posted yesterday.

But yeah, I know, the AP is part of the deep state too...  

that’s interesting 

unless I am missing a group of votes..

the Total number of votes in 2020 (including the independent vote) and the current tally is further off than this..

SGH

JohnInCarolina said:

One of the largest checks on efficiency concerns the Senate filibuster.  Most people are expecting the new GOP majority to kill it, but we'll see.

I hope that they do not. I am as far right leaning as it gets but I do not believe in changing the rules. We have a system that might not be perfect but it’s definitely the best system in the world. Our Founding Fathers knew what they was doing. Leave things alone. 

SGH

The rules you change today to suit your needs can be the very rules that come back to bite you in the azz when the shoe is on the other foot.  

Ozzie_Isaac

SGH said:

The rules you change today to suit your needs can be the very rules that come back to bite you in the azz when the shoe is on the other foot.  

Truer words have never been spoken.

JohnInCarolina

SGH said:

JohnInCarolina said:

One of the largest checks on efficiency concerns the Senate filibuster.  Most people are expecting the new GOP majority to kill it, but we'll see.

I hope that they do not. I am as far right leaning as it gets but I do not believe in changing the rules. We have a system that might not be perfect but it’s definitely the best system in the world. Our Founding Fathers knew what they was doing. Leave things alone. 

The Founding Fathers did not use this form of filibuster in the Senate.  It is a relatively modern invention.