Elections-not only sunk but removed

Davec433 said:

You can't vet people who aren't in a database.

JohnInCarolina said:

Davec433 said:

You can't vet people who aren't in a database.

You can, and we do:

https://www.facebook.com/BryanScottHicks/posts/1187326084630475

Davec433 said:

How are they showing up in the USA if it takes two years to vet them?

http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/justinholcomb/2015/11/15/syrian-refugees-arrive-in-new-orleans-n2080928

DMW said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Davec433 said:

How are they showing up in the USA if it takes two years to vet them?

http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/justinholcomb/2015/11/15/syrian-refugees-arrive-in-new-orleans-n2080928

Because the Syrian war has been going on for about four years?  It's not like we just started the process for reviewing refugees yesterday. 

Or it was false reporting...
http://www.snopes.com/refugees-new-orleans/

pgprescott said:

Acn said:

JohnInCarolina said:

pgprescott said:

He drew a line and sat back and watched them piss all over it. He drew the line, not me, not congress, him alone. He could have taken action and coalesced others to do the same,as others have done before him. He could have wiped Isis out back when they were JV team as he called them, instead he does nothing. All he cares bout is his misguided grade school domestic policies. But, these foreign issue will be domestic soon enough I guess. It is all about him and his staggering inaction. Even now he insists everything is going as planned. His sec of state suggested the Charlie hebdo massacre was justified. Leadership is not just "rhetoric" except in his case. We need someone who will make the tough decisions. We are a laughing stock. Sorry, that's what I see with my eyes wide open. Hard to believe I admit. These things don't happen in a vacuum. If you haven't seen or heard any suggestions you are willfully blind and deaf. You don't want to hear or see. The solutions all require the one thing he will not do. Everybody knows it too. 

What is that one thing?   

I suppose he could invent a time machine and go back in time and not invade Iraq.

A purely military solution isn't going to work - we tried that once and created the current mess because we have no idea how to win the peace. 

Why not blame it on Vietnam? Isis didn't even exist. Syria is not Iraq. We gave away all our gains over there for nothing but bs political promises by a juvenile. Really dumb to think what we are facing today is a result of Bush policies. What else can we heap on that load of crap reasoning.  Again, not a vacuum. We retreated and played nice and they like us even less. Good job. No one ever said a purely military solution is the answer, but I am 100% confident the half hearted military efforts we put forth will do nothing. We have surrendered our influence and destroyed our partnerships through inaction which has left many of our friends in extreme danger and running to seek safety elsewhere, often with less friendly, to us, people. I find it really disturbing that we send people on. Half ass missions. I would rather we send them to win or just get them out 100%. No one wants to,partner with us cuz we are not a respected and reliable ally any more. Name one, one alliance, which is better today. Please, no one created this mess but the current admin. Things happen and we must act one way or another. Then there are reactions by others and consequences for our decisions and actions, or lack there of. It is not a complex idea. I suppose over the next ten years, you will blame every bad thing on the current prez? Or will it be Bushs fault still? Own it. 

Durangler said:

I want to know what President @JohnInCarolina  would do to fix this mess. He's good at stirring the pot, posting frivolous links, leaning toward compassion, stating his guests have been there & done that.
 
So, John, move out of the shadows with your alien compadres and tell us who, in this current presidential campaign, is your hero... 
We need to fix this situation & I wonder who, in your opinion, would serve the people of this great country, the best. 
Who do you endorse, @JohnInCarolina ? Everyone wants to know... please

Acn said:

pgprescott said:

Acn said:

JohnInCarolina said:

pgprescott said:

He drew a line and sat back and watched them piss all over it. He drew the line, not me, not congress, him alone. He could have taken action and coalesced others to do the same,as others have done before him. He could have wiped Isis out back when they were JV team as he called them, instead he does nothing. All he cares bout is his misguided grade school domestic policies. But, these foreign issue will be domestic soon enough I guess. It is all about him and his staggering inaction. Even now he insists everything is going as planned. His sec of state suggested the Charlie hebdo massacre was justified. Leadership is not just "rhetoric" except in his case. We need someone who will make the tough decisions. We are a laughing stock. Sorry, that's what I see with my eyes wide open. Hard to believe I admit. These things don't happen in a vacuum. If you haven't seen or heard any suggestions you are willfully blind and deaf. You don't want to hear or see. The solutions all require the one thing he will not do. Everybody knows it too. 

What is that one thing?   

I suppose he could invent a time machine and go back in time and not invade Iraq.

A purely military solution isn't going to work - we tried that once and created the current mess because we have no idea how to win the peace. 

Why not blame it on Vietnam? Isis didn't even exist. Syria is not Iraq. We gave away all our gains over there for nothing but bs political promises by a juvenile. Really dumb to think what we are facing today is a result of Bush policies. What else can we heap on that load of crap reasoning.  Again, not a vacuum. We retreated and played nice and they like us even less. Good job. No one ever said a purely military solution is the answer, but I am 100% confident the half hearted military efforts we put forth will do nothing. We have surrendered our influence and destroyed our partnerships through inaction which has left many of our friends in extreme danger and running to seek safety elsewhere, often with less friendly, to us, people. I find it really disturbing that we send people on. Half ass missions. I would rather we send them to win or just get them out 100%. No one wants to,partner with us cuz we are not a respected and reliable ally any more. Name one, one alliance, which is better today. Please, no one created this mess but the current admin. Things happen and we must act one way or another. Then there are reactions by others and consequences for our decisions and actions, or lack there of. It is not a complex idea. I suppose over the next ten years, you will blame every bad thing on the current prez? Or will it be Bushs fault still? Own it. 

Do some reading bro - do you know what ISIS stands for?  Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.  Also known as ISIL , Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.  They initially developed a significantly amount of strength by recruiting Sunnis and Ba'athists who were elite Republican Guardsmen and leaders in the Hussein government.  Own the fact that this is Bush's baby.  Could Obama have done better? Obviously.  But with the exception of Desert Storm and Desert Shield no president has done anything productive in the region since Eisenhower assassinated the last democratically elected leader in the region.

Durangler said:

I'm not surprised at your response to vote for Deez Nuts, a typical elusive response to a serious question. It's just a joke to you...right? @JohnInCarolina
Your not man enough to tell this forum who you believe would serve this nation the best. But never hesitate to bash those who do. 
Why?

DoubleEgger said:

Sounds like JIC would make a great politician as he can't answer a simple question without smartass remarks and diversions. 

pgprescott said:

Acn said:

JohnInCarolina said:

pgprescott said:

He drew a line and sat back and watched them piss all over it. He drew the line, not me, not congress, him alone. He could have taken action and coalesced others to do the same,as others have done before him. He could have wiped Isis out back when they were JV team as he called them, instead he does nothing. All he cares bout is his misguided grade school domestic policies. But, these foreign issue will be domestic soon enough I guess. It is all about him and his staggering inaction. Even now he insists everything is going as planned. His sec of state suggested the Charlie hebdo massacre was justified. Leadership is not just "rhetoric" except in his case. We need someone who will make the tough decisions. We are a laughing stock. Sorry, that's what I see with my eyes wide open. Hard to believe I admit. These things don't happen in a vacuum. If you haven't seen or heard any suggestions you are willfully blind and deaf. You don't want to hear or see. The solutions all require the one thing he will not do. Everybody knows it too. 

What is that one thing?   

I suppose he could invent a time machine and go back in time and not invade Iraq.

A purely military solution isn't going to work - we tried that once and created the current mess because we have no idea how to win the peace. 

Why not blame it on Vietnam? Isis didn't even exist. Syria is not Iraq. We gave away all our gains over there for nothing but bs political promises by a juvenile. Really dumb to think what we are facing today is a result of Bush policies. What else can we heap on that load of crap reasoning.  Again, not a vacuum. We retreated and played nice and they like us even less. Good job. No one ever said a purely military solution is the answer, but I am 100% confident the half hearted military efforts we put forth will do nothing. We have surrendered our influence and destroyed our partnerships through inaction which has left many of our friends in extreme danger and running to seek safety elsewhere, often with less friendly, to us, people. I find it really disturbing that we send people on. Half ass missions. I would rather we send them to win or just get them out 100%. No one wants to,partner with us cuz we are not a respected and reliable ally any more. Name one, one alliance, which is better today. Please, no one created this mess but the current admin. Things happen and we must act one way or another. Then there are reactions by others and consequences for our decisions and actions, or lack there of. It is not a complex idea. I suppose over the next ten years, you will blame every bad thing on the current prez? Or will it be Bushs fault still? Own it. 

Durangler said:

And you know your ****, @JohnInCarolina  does it stink?

I'd take any candidate over your DeezNuts candidate...  Lame response. 
Are you ashamed to note your candidate?
The GOP group I support hasn't shaken out yet.
The Democrats have narrowed the field. Hillary, Bernie, or the goof Martin. Slim, pickins, unless your committed.
DeezNuts is your choice? Still? You serious? Really? 
I think your smarter than that. You know your better than that, I know your better than that. #True (whatever that means)