OT - Epic Meltdown

JohnInCarolina

setdahook said:

Well so far he's trying and even doing the things he said he would do. So let him run and get another win bwahahahaha

Yep.  The wall is built, Mexico is paying extra for it, Mooslims have been permabanned from entering the country, and Obamacare has been repealed.  All within the first 100 days, just like he promised.  It's a well-oiled machine there in the White House.

TN_Sister_State

Eoin

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

YukonRon

The election of Trump is proof that the conspiracy truly exists which directed the Department of Education start a dumbing down process to the nations children who attend public schools supported by federal dollars.

DoubleEgger

fishlessman said:

JohnInCarolina said:

fishlessman said:

a republican without reason and accountability is a liberal, knew it a year ago, see it more every day, trumps a darn liberal did i say it clear enough, sloooowww enough

Lol, seek therapy bro.

i must just talk too fast for you southern boys   odd that the liberal left media gave him so much attention that it put him on top theres the collusion.

Woah there Nelly. I think JIC is from your neck of the woods originally. 

DoubleEgger

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

JohnInCarolina

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

JohnInCarolina

DoubleEgger said:

fishlessman said:

JohnInCarolina said:

fishlessman said:

a republican without reason and accountability is a liberal, knew it a year ago, see it more every day, trumps a darn liberal did i say it clear enough, sloooowww enough

Lol, seek therapy bro.

i must just talk too fast for you southern boys   odd that the liberal left media gave him so much attention that it put him on top theres the collusion.

Woah there Nelly. I think JIC is from your neck of the woods originally. 

Not just originally, for most of my life.  I just don't type with an accent.

Eoin

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Yes, they're all at it.

Legume

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

I read a short article about this, I'll see if I can find it.  Basically pointing out that Trump is sidestepping the RFK rule by making Ivanka and Jared advisors, but using them like cabinet members.  The main point of the article was that Kushner has no qualifications.

Eoin

Legume said:

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

I read a short article about this, I'll see if I can find it.  Basically pointing out that Trump is sidestepping the RFK rule by making Ivanka and Jared advisors, but using them like cabinet members.  The main point of the article was that Kushner has no qualifications.

Not sure many politicians have actual qualifications, so he'll fit right in.

JohnInCarolina

Legume said:

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

I read a short article about this, I'll see if I can find it.  Basically pointing out that Trump is sidestepping the RFK rule by making Ivanka and Jared advisors, but using them like cabinet members.  The main point of the article was that Kushner has no qualifications.

Well I think it's obvious he's being tasked with things that are way outside his wheelhouse, like reforming government or bringing peace to the Middle East.  Although in Jared's defense, the latter is largely about real estate.

I'm pretty sure Ivanka and Jared are there primarily because Trump doesn't really trust anyone else.  The guy is obviously paranoid.  He may also have trouble paying attention in meetings, so they're there to help keep him focused and perhaps change the occasional diaper.

JohnInCarolina

Eoin said:

Legume said:

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

I read a short article about this, I'll see if I can find it.  Basically pointing out that Trump is sidestepping the RFK rule by making Ivanka and Jared advisors, but using them like cabinet members.  The main point of the article was that Kushner has no qualifications.

Not sure many politicians have actual qualifications, so he'll fit right in.

Fair enough.   It's not as though someone with say expertise in constitutional law ever runs for office.

Eoin

JohnInCarolina said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

I read a short article about this, I'll see if I can find it.  Basically pointing out that Trump is sidestepping the RFK rule by making Ivanka and Jared advisors, but using them like cabinet members.  The main point of the article was that Kushner has no qualifications.

Not sure many politicians have actual qualifications, so he'll fit right in.

Fair enough.   It's not as though someone with say expertise in constitutional law ever runs for office.

A lot of our politicians are lawyers, too many. The political class is becoming very narrow in its experience, lawyer then politician seems very popular. When did politicians stop having real jobs in their past?

DoubleEgger

Eoin said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

I read a short article about this, I'll see if I can find it.  Basically pointing out that Trump is sidestepping the RFK rule by making Ivanka and Jared advisors, but using them like cabinet members.  The main point of the article was that Kushner has no qualifications.

Not sure many politicians have actual qualifications, so he'll fit right in.

Fair enough.   It's not as though someone with say expertise in constitutional law ever runs for office.

A lot of our politicians are lawyers, too many. The political class is becoming very narrow in its experience, lawyer then politician seems very popular. When did politicians stop having real jobs in their past?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_occupation

JohnInCarolina

Eoin said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

I read a short article about this, I'll see if I can find it.  Basically pointing out that Trump is sidestepping the RFK rule by making Ivanka and Jared advisors, but using them like cabinet members.  The main point of the article was that Kushner has no qualifications.

Not sure many politicians have actual qualifications, so he'll fit right in.

Fair enough.   It's not as though someone with say expertise in constitutional law ever runs for office.

A lot of our politicians are lawyers, too many. The political class is becoming very narrow in its experience, lawyer then politician seems very popular. When did politicians stop having real jobs in their past?

I guess a lot depends on what constitutes a "real" job.  Being a mayor of a city, a governor of a state - it's plenty of work.  It's not all parades and baby kissing.

DoubleEgger

JohnInCarolina said:

Eoin said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

I read a short article about this, I'll see if I can find it.  Basically pointing out that Trump is sidestepping the RFK rule by making Ivanka and Jared advisors, but using them like cabinet members.  The main point of the article was that Kushner has no qualifications.

Not sure many politicians have actual qualifications, so he'll fit right in.

Fair enough.   It's not as though someone with say expertise in constitutional law ever runs for office.

A lot of our politicians are lawyers, too many. The political class is becoming very narrow in its experience, lawyer then politician seems very popular. When did politicians stop having real jobs in their past?

I guess a lot depends on what constitutes a "real" job.  Being a mayor of a city, a governor of a state - it's plenty of work.  It's not all parades and baby kissing.

There's corruption, bribery, fraud....

Legume

DoubleEgger said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Eoin said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

I read a short article about this, I'll see if I can find it.  Basically pointing out that Trump is sidestepping the RFK rule by making Ivanka and Jared advisors, but using them like cabinet members.  The main point of the article was that Kushner has no qualifications.

Not sure many politicians have actual qualifications, so he'll fit right in.

Fair enough.   It's not as though someone with say expertise in constitutional law ever runs for office.

A lot of our politicians are lawyers, too many. The political class is becoming very narrow in its experience, lawyer then politician seems very popular. When did politicians stop having real jobs in their past?

I guess a lot depends on what constitutes a "real" job.  Being a mayor of a city, a governor of a state - it's plenty of work.  It's not all parades and baby kissing.

There's corruption, bribery, fraud....

All familiar business terms.

JohnInCarolina

DoubleEgger said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Eoin said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

I read a short article about this, I'll see if I can find it.  Basically pointing out that Trump is sidestepping the RFK rule by making Ivanka and Jared advisors, but using them like cabinet members.  The main point of the article was that Kushner has no qualifications.

Not sure many politicians have actual qualifications, so he'll fit right in.

Fair enough.   It's not as though someone with say expertise in constitutional law ever runs for office.

A lot of our politicians are lawyers, too many. The political class is becoming very narrow in its experience, lawyer then politician seems very popular. When did politicians stop having real jobs in their past?

I guess a lot depends on what constitutes a "real" job.  Being a mayor of a city, a governor of a state - it's plenty of work.  It's not all parades and baby kissing.

There's corruption, bribery, fraud....

Right.  As opposed to what goes on in corporations, where everything's clean.

DoubleEgger

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Eoin said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

Eoin said:

Legume said:

Trump won't run again...if he's still around then.  Any hint of him not being able to win and he's out of there.

Kushner '20


  

Absolutely setting up his family for future political careers. Nepotism rules.

The Adams, Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushs,  and Clintons have all done the same. It's been going on since the beginning. 

Nepotism is generally associated with giving jobs/positions to relatives instead of others who might be more deserving, rather than following in the footsteps of the family politically or just running on the family name.

So you have a point with the Kennedys, but less so with say the Bushes or Clintons.

I read a short article about this, I'll see if I can find it.  Basically pointing out that Trump is sidestepping the RFK rule by making Ivanka and Jared advisors, but using them like cabinet members.  The main point of the article was that Kushner has no qualifications.

Not sure many politicians have actual qualifications, so he'll fit right in.

Fair enough.   It's not as though someone with say expertise in constitutional law ever runs for office.

A lot of our politicians are lawyers, too many. The political class is becoming very narrow in its experience, lawyer then politician seems very popular. When did politicians stop having real jobs in their past?

I guess a lot depends on what constitutes a "real" job.  Being a mayor of a city, a governor of a state - it's plenty of work.  It's not all parades and baby kissing.

There's corruption, bribery, fraud....

Right.  As opposed to what goes on in corporations, where everything's clean.

Never said it wasn't 

JohnInCarolina

A photo of Kushner in Iraq has leaked:

pgprescott

JohnInCarolina said:

A photo of Kushner in Iraq has leaked:

Looks eerily similar to you John?  

fishlessman

DoubleEgger said:

fishlessman said:

JohnInCarolina said:

fishlessman said:

a republican without reason and accountability is a liberal, knew it a year ago, see it more every day, trumps a darn liberal did i say it clear enough, sloooowww enough

Lol, seek therapy bro.

i must just talk too fast for you southern boys   odd that the liberal left media gave him so much attention that it put him on top theres the collusion.

Woah there Nelly. I think JIC is from your neck of the woods originally. 

the ones that cant keep up head south, looney snow birds

Eggdicted_Dawgfan

Is it more sad that the dems best candidate could not beat the republican candidate who the dems hate so much and think he is so terrible? Have the demlibs even given the winner a chance? The republicans gave Obama a chance. Why is it so different? Trumps twitter feed is flooded by demlibs copying and pasting to a BBQ forum. I've never see such crybabies. Did you really think someone as crooked as Hillary and the Clinton family could win the election? Yes, of course you did. And that goes to show how twisted your mind thinks. People are beginning to wake up and see that corruption does not have to be a way of life. Trump won the republican side by a long shot. Pill won the dem side by a long shot. Who the hell do you all of a sudden think is the right person for the job now?

fishlessman

JohnInCarolina said:

DoubleEgger said:

fishlessman said:

JohnInCarolina said:

fishlessman said:

a republican without reason and accountability is a liberal, knew it a year ago, see it more every day, trumps a darn liberal did i say it clear enough, sloooowww enough

Lol, seek therapy bro.

i must just talk too fast for you southern boys   odd that the liberal left media gave him so much attention that it put him on top theres the collusion.

Woah there Nelly. I think JIC is from your neck of the woods originally. 

Not just originally, for most of my life.  I just don't type with an accent.

you think theres no accent, im hearing a kennedy accent

JohnInCarolina

Eggdicted_Dawgfan said:

Is it more sad that the dems best candidate could not beat the republican candidate who the dems hate so much and think he is so terrible? Have the demlibs even given the winner a chance? The republicans gave Obama a chance. Why is it so different? Trumps twitter feed is flooded by demlibs copying and pasting to a BBQ forum. I've never see such crybabies. Did you really think someone as crooked as Hillary and the Clinton family could win the election? Yes, of course you did. And that goes to show how twisted your mind thinks. People are beginning to wake up and see that corruption does not have to be a way of life. Trump won the republican side by a long shot. Pill won the dem side by a long shot. Who the hell do you all of a sudden think is the right person for the job now?

The notion that Republicans gave Obama a chance is, well...

Eggdicted_Dawgfan

Really? Funny that's all you were able to gather out of that. Where the republicans protesting in the streets and crying like this when obama was elected? Maybe they did and it just wasn't news worthy.

JohnInCarolina

Eggdicted_Dawgfan said:

Really? Funny that's all you were able to gather out of that. Where the republicans protesting in the streets and crying like this when obama was elected? Maybe they did and it just wasn't news worthy.

Obviously you've never heard of the Tea Party.

JohnInCarolina

Eggdicted_Dawgfan said:

 People are beginning to wake up and see that corruption does not have to be a way of life. 

Trump literally just paid out a $25M settlement for scamming people out of their savings with a phony University.

It seems like maybe a lot of folks are still very much asleep.

Eggdicted_Dawgfan

Actually I have. Seems a little different