Welcome to the EGGhead Forum - a great place to visit and packed with tips and EGGspert advice! You can also join the conversation and get more information and amazing kamado recipes by following Big Green Egg to Experience our World of Flavor™ at:
Want to see how the EGG is made? Click to Watch
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | Pinterest | Youtube | Vimeo
Share your photos by tagging us and using the hashtag #BigGreenEgg.
Share your photos by tagging us and using the hashtag #BigGreenEgg.
Want to see how the EGG is made? Click to Watch
Arizona decisions....
Comments
-
fishlessman said:HeavyG said:pgprescott said:StillH2OEgger said:pgprescott said:How many do you employ Capt.
I guess I could ask how many more people you will be hiring and reinvesting into your business as a result of all the tax breaks? Probably the same amount as everyone who will be paying at lesser rates under this plan, which is little to nothing.
I'm old enough to remember when in 2001 "really smart people" were predicting that Dubyas tax cuts would essentially eliminate the federal debt by the year 2010.
I'm sure this time will be different."I've made a note never to piss you two off." - Stike -
It's interesting watching the two parties respond to the sexual assault business within their own ranks.
Conyers has resigned, and there are increasing calls for Franken to do the same. Personally I hope he does, because he should.
Meanwhile Blake Farenthold remains in good standing, and the RNC is sending money to Alabama to help Roy Moore get elected.
Fairly stark."I've made a note never to piss you two off." - Stike -
JohnInCarolina said:fishlessman said:my deductions add up to claiming 5 and getting a refund while being single with no kids. the local income tax deduction going away and the property tax being limited to 10k hurts, living close to boston is a bad idea, friggin blue state
The members of the congressional GOP from California just figured that out this morning, and man are they pissed.
fukahwee maineyou can lead a fish to water but you can not make him drink it -
One of the things that's in the bill on the House side but not the Senate is a tax on... graduate student tuition waivers. Normally grad students, especially in the STEM fields, have their tuition waived. If this provision makes it through the conference, they'll be asked to pay taxes on money they never see. And it's a lot of money. Graduate tuition at MIT, for example, is north of 50k a year.
You know, because... we don't need any more stinking scientists or engineers in this country! Especially when we can just import them from other countries. Oh wait...
The stupidity is mind-numbing."I've made a note never to piss you two off." - Stike -
Some people used to pay to be trickled on, now we all will.
-
JohnInCarolina said:One of the things that's in the bill on the House side but not the Senate is a tax on... graduate student tuition waivers. Normally grad students, especially in the STEM fields, have their tuition waived. If this provision makes it through the conference, they'll be asked to pay taxes on money they never see. And it's a lot of money. Graduate tuition at MIT, for example, is north of 50k a year.
You know, because... we don't need any more stinking scientists or engineers in this country! Especially when we can just import them from other countries. Oh wait...
The stupidity is mind-numbing.
fukahwee maineyou can lead a fish to water but you can not make him drink it -
JohnInCarolina said:One of the things that's in the bill on the House side but not the Senate is a tax on... graduate student tuition waivers. Normally grad students, especially in the STEM fields, have their tuition waived. If this provision makes it through the conference, they'll be asked to pay taxes on money they never see. And it's a lot of money. Graduate tuition at MIT, for example, is north of 50k a year.
You know, because... we don't need any more stinking scientists or engineers in this country! Especially when we can just import them from other countries. Oh wait...
The stupidity is mind-numbing.Love you bro! -
"I've made a note never to piss you two off." - Stike
-
fishlessman said:JohnInCarolina said:fishlessman said:my deductions add up to claiming 5 and getting a refund while being single with no kids. the local income tax deduction going away and the property tax being limited to 10k hurts, living close to boston is a bad idea, friggin blue state
The members of the congressional GOP from California just figured that out this morning, and man are they pissed.
-
Legume said:JohnInCarolina said:One of the things that's in the bill on the House side but not the Senate is a tax on... graduate student tuition waivers. Normally grad students, especially in the STEM fields, have their tuition waived. If this provision makes it through the conference, they'll be asked to pay taxes on money they never see. And it's a lot of money. Graduate tuition at MIT, for example, is north of 50k a year.
You know, because... we don't need any more stinking scientists or engineers in this country! Especially when we can just import them from other countries. Oh wait...
The stupidity is mind-numbing.
It really depends on the student and the institution, the nature of research, etc. It can be the university who picks up the tab, or the research grant supporting the student, external fellowships, and so forth. But typically even with research grants, they're only picking up a fraction of the tuition.
The point is that the students never see the money themselves. Most engineering students, for example, know that if they go to grad school they won't have to pay tuition. Now the expectation is that they'll have to pay a tax on that benefit, as though they had received the full amount of tuition as income. Assuming this makes it through conference (and I really hope cooler heads prevail), the net effect will simply be a decrease in the number of graduate students across the country. I don't see any way around it."I've made a note never to piss you two off." - Stike -
Eoin said:fishlessman said:JohnInCarolina said:fishlessman said:my deductions add up to claiming 5 and getting a refund while being single with no kids. the local income tax deduction going away and the property tax being limited to 10k hurts, living close to boston is a bad idea, friggin blue state
The members of the congressional GOP from California just figured that out this morning, and man are they pissed.
fukahwee maineyou can lead a fish to water but you can not make him drink it -
Legume said:JohnInCarolina said:One of the things that's in the bill on the House side but not the Senate is a tax on... graduate student tuition waivers. Normally grad students, especially in the STEM fields, have their tuition waived. If this provision makes it through the conference, they'll be asked to pay taxes on money they never see. And it's a lot of money. Graduate tuition at MIT, for example, is north of 50k a year.
You know, because... we don't need any more stinking scientists or engineers in this country! Especially when we can just import them from other countries. Oh wait...
The stupidity is mind-numbing. -
I would venture that the access to gubmint provided /backed $$ has been a big player in fueling the healthy rise in tuition over the past several decades.
Similar to the housing boom of the early 2000's. We know how that turned out...Louisville; Rolling smoke in the neighbourhood. # 38 for the win. Life is too short for light/lite beer! Seems I'm livin in a transitional period. -
pgprescott said:Legume said:JohnInCarolina said:One of the things that's in the bill on the House side but not the Senate is a tax on... graduate student tuition waivers. Normally grad students, especially in the STEM fields, have their tuition waived. If this provision makes it through the conference, they'll be asked to pay taxes on money they never see. And it's a lot of money. Graduate tuition at MIT, for example, is north of 50k a year.
You know, because... we don't need any more stinking scientists or engineers in this country! Especially when we can just import them from other countries. Oh wait...
The stupidity is mind-numbing.Love you bro! -
lousubcap said:I would venture that the access to gubmint provided /backed $$ has been a big player in fueling the healthy rise in tuition over the past several decades.
Similar to the housing boom of the early 2000's. We know how that turned out...
fukahwee maineyou can lead a fish to water but you can not make him drink it -
lousubcap said:I would venture that the access to gubmint provided /backed $$ has been a big player in fueling the healthy rise in tuition over the past several decades.
Similar to the housing boom of the early 2000's. We know how that turned out...
Outside of STEM fields, there's not a whole lot of government research money going towards graduate student tuition. STEM is far and away the biggest driver, perhaps for obvious reasons.
I come from a fairly modest background. I went to college on a full-ride, merit based scholarship. My parents could not afford to send me anywhere else really. In grad school my tuition was waived and I received a stipend of around $1300 a month (before I was a DOE fellow) that I had to pay taxes on. My rent at the time was $450 a month. There wasn't much left for anything else. I lived paycheck to paycheck and ate a lot of ramen pride. Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining - I had the luxury of being paid to go to school and to do reserch and I loved it.
If I'd had to pay taxes on the tuition that was waived at the time - around an additional $30k a year, I just wouldn't have been able to afford to go to graduate school. I think if we're moving towards a system where only the wealthy can afford to pursue advanced degrees, even in STEM fields where there's a national shortage... we're doing something very wrong as a country."I've made a note never to piss you two off." - Stike -
Legume said:pgprescott said:Legume said:JohnInCarolina said:One of the things that's in the bill on the House side but not the Senate is a tax on... graduate student tuition waivers. Normally grad students, especially in the STEM fields, have their tuition waived. If this provision makes it through the conference, they'll be asked to pay taxes on money they never see. And it's a lot of money. Graduate tuition at MIT, for example, is north of 50k a year.
You know, because... we don't need any more stinking scientists or engineers in this country! Especially when we can just import them from other countries. Oh wait...
The stupidity is mind-numbing.
It it is hilarious to think the government pays for anything. They don’t make money. They only spend what they take from the taxpayer(and then some). It’s also funny to think about the university sitting around and paying for anything. They just pass the cost on to the paying consumer. You think all the staff fills a candy jar with $100 bills to pay others tuition? It’s laughable. They might make it look that way in order to garner faux positive attention, but it’s faux. -
lousubcap said:I would venture that the access to gubmint provided /backed $$ has been a big player in fueling the healthy rise in tuition over the past several decades.
Similar to the housing boom of the early 2000's. We know how that turned out... -
JohnInCarolina said:lousubcap said:I would venture that the access to gubmint provided /backed $$ has been a big player in fueling the healthy rise in tuition over the past several decades.
Similar to the housing boom of the early 2000's. We know how that turned out...
Outside of STEM fields, there's not a whole lot of government research money going towards graduate student tuition. STEM is far and away the biggest driver, perhaps for obvious reasons.
I come from a fairly modest background. I went to college on a full-ride, merit based scholarship. My parents could not afford to send me anywhere else really. In grad school my tuition was waived and I received a stipend of around $1300 a month (before I was a DOE fellow) that I had to pay taxes on. My rent at the time was $450 a month. There wasn't much left for anything else. I lived paycheck to paycheck and ate a lot of ramen pride. Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining - I had the luxury of being paid to go to school and to do reserch and I loved it.
If I'd had to pay taxes on the tuition that was waived at the time - around an additional $30k a year, I just wouldn't have been able to afford to go to graduate school. I think if we're moving towards a system where only the wealthy can afford to pursue advanced degrees, even in STEM fields where there's a national shortage... we're doing something very wrong as a country.
fukahwee maineyou can lead a fish to water but you can not make him drink it -
fishlessman said:JohnInCarolina said:lousubcap said:I would venture that the access to gubmint provided /backed $$ has been a big player in fueling the healthy rise in tuition over the past several decades.
Similar to the housing boom of the early 2000's. We know how that turned out...
Outside of STEM fields, there's not a whole lot of government research money going towards graduate student tuition. STEM is far and away the biggest driver, perhaps for obvious reasons.
I come from a fairly modest background. I went to college on a full-ride, merit based scholarship. My parents could not afford to send me anywhere else really. In grad school my tuition was waived and I received a stipend of around $1300 a month (before I was a DOE fellow) that I had to pay taxes on. My rent at the time was $450 a month. There wasn't much left for anything else. I lived paycheck to paycheck and ate a lot of ramen pride. Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining - I had the luxury of being paid to go to school and to do reserch and I loved it.
If I'd had to pay taxes on the tuition that was waived at the time - around an additional $30k a year, I just wouldn't have been able to afford to go to graduate school. I think if we're moving towards a system where only the wealthy can afford to pursue advanced degrees, even in STEM fields where there's a national shortage... we're doing something very wrong as a country.
Industry will typically pay for their employees to get masters degrees. Some will pay for a PhD, but that's unusual. Typically the turnaround time on a PhD is too long for most industries to commit to.
Industry generally isn't all that interested in funding fundamental science research. They often use the results of the work extensively, but they're not interested in paying for it themselves.
"I've made a note never to piss you two off." - Stike -
So...an FJ Cruiser or a Wrangler?______________________________________________I love lamp..
-
Philly - Kansas City - Houston - Cincinnati - Dallas - Houston - Memphis - Austin - Chicago - Austin
Large BGE. OONI 16, TOTO Washlet S550e (Now with enhanced Motherly Hugs!)
"If I wanted my balls washed, I'd go to the golf course!"
Dennis - Austin,TX -
I'd go with the FJ Cruiser as the Jeep is junk. imo
Not to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol is a solution...
Large & Small BGE
Stockton Ca.
-
I can take care of your Cayman. You wouldn't iwant it out there in that harsh environment.Sandy Springs & Dawsonville Ga
-
-
=======================================
XL 6/06, Mini 6/12, L 10/12, Mini #2 12/14 MiniMax 3/16 Large #2 11/20 Legacy from my FIL - RIP
Tampa Bay, FL
EIB 6 Oct 95 -
@pgprescott the msn taxes chart covers the working poor to upper middle class/lower upper class
Do you have any material that shows how it affects the top 1%?
i don’t think I’ll be doing cartwheels over an extra 2-3k - disproportionate benefit to the rich that they don’t need and won’t make any difference in their day to day life just like my 2-3k will make little difference to me
i dont think its a fair plan
ill listen and consider anything I’m missing though“There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body.”
Coach Finstock Teen Wolf -
@Hans61 I think the rates are unchanged at the highest level. Doh! If you notice in this chart the percentage of cut goes down as the income goes up. I’ll take your 3k. I’ll send you my address and you can just mail me a check. What do you want, a $50000 cut what you only pay in 20k? Jeez. The benefit is disproportionate, it just happens to be punitive on the wealthy. Just as the current system is also biased towards the poor. That’s why they call it progressive taxation. Now, capitol gains is another story all together. I would argue that that money has already been taxed, then they tax it again. That’s the beauty of Govt.
people should ponder why folks like Gates and Buffet have zero intention of leaving their fortunes to the Treasury. -
@Hans61 this appears to show that they will in fact get a cut to 35%. We shall see in the end. I’m glad I don’t have to pay 35%
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trumps-tax-plan-will-hurt-this-one-bracket-of-high-income-earners-2017-10-23
-
Go away, simpleton.______________________________________________I love lamp..
Categories
- All Categories
- 183.2K EggHead Forum
- 15.7K Forum List
- 460 EGGtoberfest
- 1.9K Forum Feedback
- 10.4K Off Topic
- 2.2K EGG Table Forum
- 1 Rules & Disclaimer
- 9K Cookbook
- 12 Valentines Day
- 91 Holiday Recipes
- 223 Appetizers
- 517 Baking
- 2.5K Beef
- 88 Desserts
- 167 Lamb
- 2.4K Pork
- 1.5K Poultry
- 32 Salads and Dressings
- 320 Sauces, Rubs, Marinades
- 544 Seafood
- 175 Sides
- 121 Soups, Stews, Chilis
- 37 Vegetarian
- 102 Vegetables
- 314 Health
- 293 Weight Loss Forum