Daily Despot Update

Botch · January 10

JohnInCarolina said:

Hey John, could you please just post the link to the original post? None of us can click on the embedded link (in blue) nor the video, from a screenshot.
Thanks.

Oh, and a newer body cam video of this incident just surfaced; rump’s new Brownshirts have been totally exposed.

StillH2OEgger · January 10

Nobody should be shocked CBS took this analysis down.

Canugghead · January 10

Botch said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Hey John, could you please just post the link to the original post? None of us can click on the embedded link (in blue) nor the video, from a screenshot.
Thanks.

Oh, and a newer body cam video of this incident just surfaced; rump’s new Brownshirts have been totally exposed.

This?

https://youtu.be/GAdwqeUFXxI?si=4rizQNdfAo0V5ZbO

TheToast · January 10

Poster in London this week near the US embassy. If you’re not familiar with the slang term, you can probably guess what it is

GrateEggspectations · January 10

@Canugghead

Nope. Not that one.

Not the original video, but a written interview. I wonder if this is a sanitized version of the one @JohnInCarolina linked.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/minnesota/news/ice-shooting-minneapolis-retired-agent-video-analysis/

Some highlights:
- The latest policy for ICE and DHS agents, which was last updated in 2023, gives only two acceptable reasons for an officer to fire a weapon into a moving vehicle — when the driver or someone inside the vehicle has a deadly weapon, or when the vehicle itself is a threat and no other reasonable defensive option exists, including moving out of the way.
- The officers are not heard identifying themselves.
- Getting in front of a vehicle is almost inducing a shooting if the person flees.

- Fleeing is not a justification for use of deadly force, the threshold for which is imminent danger.
- Good appeared to be trying to flee.

- Law enforcement’s role is to de-escalate.

JohnInCarolina · January 10

Botch said:

JohnInCarolina said:

Hey John, could you please just post the link to the original post? None of us can click on the embedded link (in blue) nor the video, from a screenshot.
Thanks.

With anything like this, the video can be obtained simply by typing the title into YouTube’s search bar. Here it is:

https://youtu.be/6ywLEESFDu0?si=T0_i6vRnKoAh1tzj

JohnInCarolina · January 10

This is a fascinating exchange with lots of detail in particular about the US involvement with Venezuela and Ukraine:

https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/phillips-obrien-on-venezuela-and

Some of it is a little outdated on VZ since it was from Tuesday and things are moving so quickly, but the rest is really interesting. For those of you following the news, I think it’s worth your time.

Botch · January 10

GrateEggspectations said:

@Canugghead

Nope. Not that one.

This is the one I was talking about; it's scary how many versions are out there, edited to fit that org's particular slant:

https://youtu.be/kYnsn0KrhCw?si=XnimPcrJASYWvgGn

JohnInCarolina · January 10

https://workdaymagazine.org/minneapolis-teachers-parents-denounce-federal-agents-assault-at-roosevelt-high-demand-ice-leave/

JohnInCarolina · January 10

https://www.ms.now/opinion/ice-minneapolis-shooting-car-renee-good-use-of-force

The reason they use the same lies over and over, is simple: enough people have a tendency to believe them.

DoubleEgger · January 10

lousubcap · January 10

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5017260/uploads/editor/la/r9lxtbdfetk5.jpeg

JohnInCarolina · January 11

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5017260/uploads/editor/du/9epf7cl3hqln.jpeg

fishlessman · January 11

Now he wants us to eat real food. WTH. Meat fruit veggies

DoubleEgger · January 11

“We won with poorly educated. I love the poorly educated.” - Donald J. Trump

JohnInCarolina · January 11

fishlessman said:

Now he wants us to eat real food. WTH. Meat fruit veggies

Not everything RFK recommends is insane, just like 95 percent.

Canugghead · January 11

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5017260/uploads/editor/ff/n8xyieagdm7b.png

GrateEggspectations · January 11

@Canugghead

People have been wondering about the identity of the ice agent. Dunno, seems pretty obvious to me.

Canugghead · January 11

Long arm of the law.

Ike · January 12

Do as I say, not as I do. The current POTUS' policies right now for foreign/domestic.

JohnInCarolina · January 12

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5017260/uploads/editor/yo/s0eu4r0y7z2y.jpeg

JohnInCarolina · January 12

https://www.startribune.com/should-ice-agents-have-refused-bystander-medical-help-at-shooting-scene/601560462

I’m sure there’s another perspective that casts this exchange in a different light, amirite?!?!?

fishlessman · January 12

JohnInCarolina said:

https://www.startribune.com/should-ice-agents-have-refused-bystander-medical-help-at-shooting-scene/601560462

I’m sure there’s another perspective that casts this exchange in a different light, amirite?!?!?

pretty sure she was not sleeping

Ozzie_Isaac · January 12

fishlessman said:

JohnInCarolina said:

https://www.startribune.com/should-ice-agents-have-refused-bystander-medical-help-at-shooting-scene/601560462

I’m sure there’s another perspective that casts this exchange in a different light, amirite?!?!?

pretty sure she was not sleeping

I agree with you here. 3 shots to the head, she probably was dead before the car hit the pole.

Pretty impressive to triple tap while holding a phone to record and fearing for his life, and her actively turning away from the agents - even if he was safely beside the car and out of harms way at the time of the trigger pulls. It’s all how he “felt” I guess. Maybe he will get a Snowflake award to go along with his Purple Heart, Medal of Honor, and something for bravery. I mean takes a cool customer to shoot an unarmed women in the face 3 times while standing besides her.

fishlessman · January 12

Ozzie_Isaac said:

fishlessman said:

JohnInCarolina said:

https://www.startribune.com/should-ice-agents-have-refused-bystander-medical-help-at-shooting-scene/601560462

I’m sure there’s another perspective that casts this exchange in a different light, amirite?!?!?

pretty sure she was not sleeping

I agree with you here. 3 shots to the head, she probably was dead before the car hit the pole.

Pretty impressive to triple tap while holding a phone to record and fearing for his life, and her actively turning away from the agents - even if he was safely beside the car and out of harms way at the time of the trigger pulls. It’s all how he “felt” I guess. Maybe he will get a Snowflake award to go along with his Purple Heart, Medal of Honor, and something for bravery. I mean takes a cool customer to shoot an unarmed women in the face 3 times while standing besides her.

as he walked around the front of the car the front wheels were turned to the left. his perspective at the time. figured i would mention that because jic likes that word so much.

JohnInCarolina · January 12

fishlessman said:

JohnInCarolina said:

https://www.startribune.com/should-ice-agents-have-refused-bystander-medical-help-at-shooting-scene/601560462

I’m sure there’s another perspective that casts this exchange in a different light, amirite?!?!?

pretty sure she was not sleeping

Your casual indifference was never in question, fish.

Ozzie_Isaac · January 12

fishlessman said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

fishlessman said:

JohnInCarolina said:

https://www.startribune.com/should-ice-agents-have-refused-bystander-medical-help-at-shooting-scene/601560462

I’m sure there’s another perspective that casts this exchange in a different light, amirite?!?!?

pretty sure she was not sleeping

I agree with you here. 3 shots to the head, she probably was dead before the car hit the pole.

Pretty impressive to triple tap while holding a phone to record and fearing for his life, and her actively turning away from the agents - even if he was safely beside the car and out of harms way at the time of the trigger pulls. It’s all how he “felt” I guess. Maybe he will get a Snowflake award to go along with his Purple Heart, Medal of Honor, and something for bravery. I mean takes a cool customer to shoot an unarmed women in the face 3 times while standing besides her.

as he walked around the front of the car the front wheels were turned to the left. his perspective at the time. figured i would mention that because jic likes that word so much.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume he did fear for his life at one moment.

After the threat is gone and he and all other government officials are out of harms way, is lethal force still warranted? If lethal force is still warranted, how long after the incident does lethal force stop being warranted? 30 sec, 30 minutes, 30 days, indefinite?

fishlessman · January 12

Ozzie_Isaac said:

fishlessman said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

fishlessman said:

JohnInCarolina said:

https://www.startribune.com/should-ice-agents-have-refused-bystander-medical-help-at-shooting-scene/601560462

I’m sure there’s another perspective that casts this exchange in a different light, amirite?!?!?

pretty sure she was not sleeping

I agree with you here. 3 shots to the head, she probably was dead before the car hit the pole.

Pretty impressive to triple tap while holding a phone to record and fearing for his life, and her actively turning away from the agents - even if he was safely beside the car and out of harms way at the time of the trigger pulls. It’s all how he “felt” I guess. Maybe he will get a Snowflake award to go along with his Purple Heart, Medal of Honor, and something for bravery. I mean takes a cool customer to shoot an unarmed women in the face 3 times while standing besides her.

as he walked around the front of the car the front wheels were turned to the left. his perspective at the time. figured i would mention that because jic likes that word so much.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume he did fear for his life at one moment.

After the threat is gone and he and all other government officials are out of harms way, is lethal force still warranted? If lethal force is still warranted, how long after the incident does lethal force stop being warranted? 30 sec, 30 minutes, 30 days, indefinite?

how can you argue what ones thoughts are during a split second in their life during an event like this. im sure he feels differently today after rewinding the event over and over in his head.

Ozzie_Isaac · January 12

fishlessman said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

fishlessman said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

fishlessman said:

JohnInCarolina said:

https://www.startribune.com/should-ice-agents-have-refused-bystander-medical-help-at-shooting-scene/601560462

I’m sure there’s another perspective that casts this exchange in a different light, amirite?!?!?

pretty sure she was not sleeping

I agree with you here. 3 shots to the head, she probably was dead before the car hit the pole.

Pretty impressive to triple tap while holding a phone to record and fearing for his life, and her actively turning away from the agents - even if he was safely beside the car and out of harms way at the time of the trigger pulls. It’s all how he “felt” I guess. Maybe he will get a Snowflake award to go along with his Purple Heart, Medal of Honor, and something for bravery. I mean takes a cool customer to shoot an unarmed women in the face 3 times while standing besides her.

as he walked around the front of the car the front wheels were turned to the left. his perspective at the time. figured i would mention that because jic likes that word so much.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume he did fear for his life at one moment.

After the threat is gone and he and all other government officials are out of harms way, is lethal force still warranted? If lethal force is still warranted, how long after the incident does lethal force stop being warranted? 30 sec, 30 minutes, 30 days, indefinite?

how can you argue what ones thoughts are during a split second in their life during an event like this. im sure he feels differently today after rewinding the event over and over in his head.

He says he felt threatened when he was in front of the car.

He was standing beside the car while it was driving away from him. If he cannot make accurate assessments of risk then he shouldn’t have a license to kill.

My guess, call me crazy if you like, was that he was pissed off and wanted to teach this lady a lesson. He did not have control of his emotions and let his ego and anger rule the moment.

same as road rage or a shooting over a parking space. Only this guy gets the Kings support.

fishlessman · January 12

Ozzie_Isaac said:

fishlessman said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

fishlessman said:

Ozzie_Isaac said:

fishlessman said:

JohnInCarolina said:

https://www.startribune.com/should-ice-agents-have-refused-bystander-medical-help-at-shooting-scene/601560462

I’m sure there’s another perspective that casts this exchange in a different light, amirite?!?!?

pretty sure she was not sleeping

I agree with you here. 3 shots to the head, she probably was dead before the car hit the pole.

Pretty impressive to triple tap while holding a phone to record and fearing for his life, and her actively turning away from the agents - even if he was safely beside the car and out of harms way at the time of the trigger pulls. It’s all how he “felt” I guess. Maybe he will get a Snowflake award to go along with his Purple Heart, Medal of Honor, and something for bravery. I mean takes a cool customer to shoot an unarmed women in the face 3 times while standing besides her.

as he walked around the front of the car the front wheels were turned to the left. his perspective at the time. figured i would mention that because jic likes that word so much.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume he did fear for his life at one moment.

After the threat is gone and he and all other government officials are out of harms way, is lethal force still warranted? If lethal force is still warranted, how long after the incident does lethal force stop being warranted? 30 sec, 30 minutes, 30 days, indefinite?

how can you argue what ones thoughts are during a split second in their life during an event like this. im sure he feels differently today after rewinding the event over and over in his head.

He says he felt threatened when he was in front of the car.

He was standing beside the car while it was driving away from him. If he cannot make accurate assessments of risk then he shouldn’t have a license to kill.

My guess, call me crazy if you like, was that he was pissed off and wanted to teach this lady a lesson. He did not have control of his emotions and let his ego and anger rule the moment.

same as road rage or a shooting over a parking space. Only this guy gets the Kings support.

i see two people making bad decisions, one paid the bigger price. could care less about the kings rhetoric

Daily Despot Update

Comments

Categories