Sous Vide

dsmithok · July 2016

I just did a bone-in New York Strip, almost 2 pounds, that had been dry aged for 45 days. I first smoked it indirect until it reached an interior temp of 100. Then I let it cool a bit while the Sous Vide was coming to 120 degrees. At that point I put it in for about an hour. Then reverse seared it at 550 degrees for a couple of minutes a side. Sorry, no pictures, but it was great.

What did I do right, or what could I have done better? I know that it was really good, but I also know that some of you have done the same cut of beef and I would like your input. My butcher almost always has something dry aging if I'm interested when he deems it is ready to enjoy.

Thanks for your input.

By the way it was done on a LGBE with Rockwood Charcoal and Pean.

RRP · July 2016

Glad you liked your method, but since you asked for opinions IMHO you did it backwards. I would have brought it up to temp via sous vide first to say 120º for at least 2 hours or probably 3 hours and then seared it. Sous vide will assure you the internal temp is far more perfect than the way you approached it. No offense - OK? but you asked!

bgebrent · July 2016

agree with @RRP. Sous vide first then sear.

Skiddymarker · July 2016

RRP said:

Glad you liked your method, but since you asked for opinions IMHO you did it backwards. I would have brought it up to temp via sous vide first to say 120º for at least 2 hours or probably 3 hours and then seared it. Sous vide will assure you the internal temp is far more perfect than the way you approached it. No offense - OK? but you asked!

Further to what Ron. Says, Chef Steps turned me onto a sear before the sous vide, just enough to colour the meat, then 2 to 3 hours for something over 2" thick, dry the surface and finish sear in a hot CI pan - I know this gives the egg the day off which may not be what you want, but the results are very good.

bgebrent · July 2016

Skiddymarker said:

RRP said:

Glad you liked your method, but since you asked for opinions IMHO you did it backwards. I would have brought it up to temp via sous vide first to say 120º for at least 2 hours or probably 3 hours and then seared it. Sous vide will assure you the internal temp is far more perfect than the way you approached it. No offense - OK? but you asked!

Further to what Ron. Says, Chef Steps turned me onto a sear before the sous vide, just enough to colour the meat, then 2 to 3 hours for something over 2" thick, dry the surface and finish sear in a hot CI pan - I know this gives the egg the day off which may not be what you want, but the results are very good.

Agree brother. Sous vide then sear is super simple. And gives an excuse to light the egg.

Photo Egg · July 2016

RRP said:

Glad you liked your method, but since you asked for opinions IMHO you did it backwards. I would have brought it up to temp via sous vide first to say 120º for at least 2 hours or probably 3 hours and then seared it. Sous vide will assure you the internal temp is far more perfect than the way you approached it. No offense - OK? but you asked!

Sounds like he did almost exactly what you said except he added a little smoke in the beginning. Am I missing something?

tarheelmatt · July 2016

Skiddymarker said:

RRP said:

Glad you liked your method, but since you asked for opinions IMHO you did it backwards. I would have brought it up to temp via sous vide first to say 120º for at least 2 hours or probably 3 hours and then seared it. Sous vide will assure you the internal temp is far more perfect than the way you approached it. No offense - OK? but you asked!

Further to what Ron. Says, Chef Steps turned me onto a sear before the sous vide, just enough to colour the meat, then 2 to 3 hours for something over 2" thick, dry the surface and finish sear in a hot CI pan - I know this gives the egg the day off which may not be what you want, but the results are very good.

Isn't that what the OP indicated he done?

Ron's technique isn't what the OP did, but what you indicated.

He seared

Then SV

Then seared

It's just another technique.

J-dubya · July 2016

tarheelmatt said:

Skiddymarker said:

RRP said:

Glad you liked your method, but since you asked for opinions IMHO you did it backwards. I would have brought it up to temp via sous vide first to say 120º for at least 2 hours or probably 3 hours and then seared it. Sous vide will assure you the internal temp is far more perfect than the way you approached it. No offense - OK? but you asked!

Further to what Ron. Says, Chef Steps turned me onto a sear before the sous vide, just enough to colour the meat, then 2 to 3 hours for something over 2" thick, dry the surface and finish sear in a hot CI pan - I know this gives the egg the day off which may not be what you want, but the results are very good.

Isn't that what the OP indicated he done?

Ron's technique isn't what the OP did, but what you indicated.

He seared

Then SV

Then seared

It's just another technique.

He brought the IT all the way up to 100, this is different from a quick pre-bath sear.

tarheelmatt · July 2016

J-dubya said:

tarheelmatt said:

Skiddymarker said:

RRP said:

Glad you liked your method, but since you asked for opinions IMHO you did it backwards. I would have brought it up to temp via sous vide first to say 120º for at least 2 hours or probably 3 hours and then seared it. Sous vide will assure you the internal temp is far more perfect than the way you approached it. No offense - OK? but you asked!

Further to what Ron. Says, Chef Steps turned me onto a sear before the sous vide, just enough to colour the meat, then 2 to 3 hours for something over 2" thick, dry the surface and finish sear in a hot CI pan - I know this gives the egg the day off which may not be what you want, but the results are very good.

Isn't that what the OP indicated he done?

Ron's technique isn't what the OP did, but what you indicated.

He seared

Then SV

Then seared

It's just another technique.

He brought the IT all the way up to 100, this is different from a quick pre-bath sear.

You're right. My bad. But Ron didn't lead to that. He lead to traditional.

SmokeyPitt · July 2016

It sounds like you did a combination of reverse sear + sous vide. The initial smoke I am sure added some flavor. Nothing wrong with this, but just my $.02 I would skip the sous vide in this scenario. If you just slow roast/smoke on the egg up to 120, let it rest, then sear I think it would be just as good and eliminate a step.

fishlessman · July 2016

been doing alot of tritips lately, have not tried the initial smoke. having better luck going closer to the 4 hour mark in the souse vide at120, more tender. i sear at a higher temp. i like the idea of the initial smoke and will try that, also want to try sousvide at a little lower temp, even 120 seems a little high for whatever reason, seems different than 120 slow roasted

Sous Vide

Comments

Categories