Stones or Beatles?

Gator Bait

 
I can't answer that question Molly, I love them both and many, many more. When you grow up with hearing as bad as mine was/is you just enjoy it all and be thankful you can hear it.

 

fishlessman

doesnt matter to me as long as its LOUD :laugh: :laugh: i could even listen to the monkees :laugh: :laugh: you cant use a cell phone within a hundred feet of my truck on the highway must piss alot of cellphone users off. i need to mount bigger speakers on the roll bar :woohoo:

cookn biker

I like it loud too!

Zippylip

said the man living on a steady diet of cous cous :blink:

Bacchus

Stones, with a semi sober Keith Richards which is/was extremely seldom.

FWIW: Jimmy Page played lead guitar on several of the Stones Hit studio recordings, while Richards was strung out on H. It's been said that JP could play KR's stuff better than KR.

Popsicle

"Stones", nuf said.
Popsicle

Desert Oasis Woman

OOOOOOO, Zef!! :woohoo:
u da man!
dig it!!
see you in Plano where we can all get Sticky!!!

Boilermaker Ben

The Monkees

kidding...Stones. Sure, I'd take Zeppelin over either, but without parameters, these things are undebatable. So I say Stones. I'm not sure which is more impressive, though, that the Beatles split up, and all four had successful solo careers (Is there any other band for whom this has happened?) or that the Stones have remained together for so long.

Jeffersonian

Stones. I like what John Waters said about the Beatles: "They sound like a loaf of white bread that sings...a loaf of white bread with a haircut."

thebtls

Really???? With my handle 'thebtls' you have to ask? I have a collection of memorabilia that you could start a museum with...these two groups aren't even on the same planet...it's like comparing Hank williams to Alice Cooper! Keep on egging!