gmac said:

Folks need to remove their "location" from their signature line and put their political affilaition because I have no idea who is serious and who is being sarcastic. This is confusing. 

The best comments are the seriously sarcastic ones.

SemolinaPilchard said:

What you plainly fail to realize is that many of us were never on the bandwagon, but rather were more of an Anybody But Clinton crowd. But hey, whatever helps you sleep at night.

lol I couldn't care less why you keep bringing her up.  The fascination with her at this point is deranged no matter the excuse.

SemolinaPilchard said:

Your little friend is the one with the fascination, and it is of Trump. Oh, and in case you missed it, you have it too. You follow his twitter posts!! 

Ah yes.  The "I know you are but what am I?" variation of the third grade comeback.

SemolinaPilchard said:

Fine, twist it however you want. You guys bring him up all the time. I only bring her up in response to you guys, as when you friend had a wish about Trump, and I responded with my wish came true. But yeah, I am eaten up with it. OK. Got it. Thanks. First step is realization.

Bringing her up in response to posts about Trump at this point is pretty weak sauce.  I mean, what are you going to do, keep talking about Clinton over the next four years?  

JohnInCarolina said:

SemolinaPilchard said:

Fine, twist it however you want. You guys bring him up all the time. I only bring her up in response to you guys, as when you friend had a wish about Trump, and I responded with my wish came true. But yeah, I am eaten up with it. OK. Got it. Thanks. First step is realization.

Bringing her up in response to posts about Trump at this point is pretty weak sauce.  I mean, what are you going to do, keep talking about Clinton over the next four years?  

Good point. Especially since she is now totally irrelevant and will never get the nomination again. What is the old song "Thank God and Greyhound she's gone."

JohnInCarolina said:

She is totally irrelevant now.  On that we agree.  Whereas Trump is our next President, and does appear to legit suffer from NPD.

In all seriousness, I do not personally know anyone who was gung-ho on Trump. I know they have some out there, otherwise he could not have won the nomination. Many of us are leery of him. We had two unbelievably horrible candidates to choose from. With roughly 320 million people we get to choose between these two? We knew (or at least thought we knew) exactly what we were going to get with her. We did not like it. Did we choose the better of the two? I hope so. Who knows, time will tell.
Getting back to Trump and his personality disorders, There was a joke I heard about him in the 90's. He is on an elevator and a gorgeous woman walks on and tells him exactly how she wants to please him. He answers her with "yeah, but what's in it for me?!!"

JohnInCarolina said:

SemolinaPilchard said:

JohnInCarolina said:

SemolinaPilchard said:

Fine, twist it however you want. You guys bring him up all the time. I only bring her up in response to you guys, as when you friend had a wish about Trump, and I responded with my wish came true. But yeah, I am eaten up with it. OK. Got it. Thanks. First step is realization.

Bringing her up in response to posts about Trump at this point is pretty weak sauce.  I mean, what are you going to do, keep talking about Clinton over the next four years?  

Good point. Especially since she is now totally irrelevant and will never get the nomination again. What is the old song "Thank God and Greyhound she's gone."

She is totally irrelevant now.  On that we agree.  Whereas Trump is our next President, and does appear to legit suffer from NPD.

John, you are not a psychiatrist.  Don't play one here my friend.

Brent hit the nail on her head.
https://youtu.be/N_JXoBXyDBw
Let's bury this old bag and move on to better things.