I did my first Spatchcock chicken a few days ago - 5.3 lb, indirect, with a drip pan below, at about 375 for about an hour. I checked the temperature after that hour and it was 180 in the thighs and a little over 170 in the breast. I cut into the skin right by the thighs and clear juices ran out.
I let it rest for about 5 mins or so, and then attempted to carve it - it wasn't pretty, but oh well! It definitely looked juicy and delicious.
As we began to eat the breasts, we thought the texture was weird - it was almost spongy. The taste was fine, color was white, but the texture was just slimy and spongy. Any ideas what I did wrong? Has anyone else had this problem?
The dark meat seemed fine - we used that for quesadillas the next day and they were incredible! Just the breasts were weird...
Thanks for your input!
0 •
Comments
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeCook lots of spatchcock chicken. I always cook direct at 400 / 425 raised. Also I looks for 3.? lbs birds and if think of it in time (50/50 on this) i leave uncovered in fridge overnight. Also like the 160 breast......
ps: same with turkey except look for 11.5 to 12 lb birds.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeBy "spongy" do you mean "rubbery?" The texture WILL change if it is undercooked, as well as overcooked. You said the meat was 170, which is more than hot enough to be properly cooked - remember that the temp keeps rising after you take it off, so it's possible you overcooked it.
If you removed the chicken at the low end of being "done" (ie, low 160's), then it might have that texture. But again, you said the temp read as 170, so by that time, the texture should be fine cuz the muscle fibers have began separating, producing that "chickeny" texture we all know & love. Also, as I said, if it's overcooked, it can have what some call a "rubbery" texture. "Spongy" or "rubbery" are somewhat subjective, which makes it hard to tell if you've over cooked, or under cooked the meat.
FWIW, my target temps are 165 for breast, 180-185 for thighs (actually, as long as the breast hits 165, I usually remove the chicken even if the thighs aren't quite to 180 yet cuz it's technically "done" anyway).
So, piggybacking off of a few other suggestions:
I've also been told that "old" chickens are tougher, dryer, and rubbery, though unless it states on the package that it's a "young" chicken, I dunno how you'd tell??
Just some questions to help narrow things down a bit...
HTH,
HH
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeAnd I know this sounds odd, but sometimes we get chickens that just aren't "right" - could be the diet they were fed, the way they were raised, their age, any hormones / chemicals they were given, etc.
Regarding the age, to expand on what I suggested earlier, I recall my grandparents commenting about old farm animals (chickens, pigs, cows, etc) and wild game (deer) not being as good to eat as younger ones.
So hopefully the next time things will be better!
Best of luck!!
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like