Welcome to the EGGhead Forum - a great place to visit and packed with tips and EGGspert advice! You can also join the conversation and get more information and amazing kamado recipes by following Big Green Egg to Experience our World of Flavor™ at:
Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Instagram  |  Pinterest  |  Youtube  |  Vimeo
Share your photos by tagging us and using the hashtag #BigGreenEgg.

Want to see how the EGG is made? Click to Watch

Beef Short Rib Sous Vide Question

Planning to do sous vide short ribs for the first time this week and am looking for any advice from people who have had good results before.
The dish I plan to make is something like; short rib with a pan gravy/sauce/reduction over cheesy grits or taters. Something green will probably make its way in too, spinach, green beans or asparagus.
I know it might be easier just to braise, but i would really like to give the sous vide a go if its worth it. Thanks!
XL, Medium BGE & Blackstone I XAR-Woo2 & Rig-BO Flameboss 500

St. Louis, MO

Comments

  • jtcBoynton
    jtcBoynton Posts: 2,814
    If you have sous vide machine, it is worth using it over a standard braise.  
    Southeast Florida - LBGE
    In cooking, often we implement steps for which we have no explanations other than ‘that’s what everybody else does’ or ‘that’s what I have been told.’  Dare to think for yourself.
     
  • dmchicago
    dmchicago Posts: 4,519
    My $0.2.

    I love short ribs...love them.

    I tried one time in the sous vide for 48 hours...they we "ok".

    Something wasn't quite right...could have been user error.

    So, I just braise them for 5-6 hours. Way better flavor to me and the house smells delicious on a Sunday afternoon.
    Philly - Kansas City - Houston - Cincinnati - Dallas - Houston - Memphis - Austin - Chicago - Austin

    Large BGE. OONI 16, TOTO Washlet S550e (Now with enhanced Motherly Hugs!)

    "If I wanted my balls washed, I'd go to the golf course!"
    Dennis - Austin,TX
  • nolaegghead
    nolaegghead Posts: 42,109
    Your plan sounds sound. 

    I have found giving the short ribs a "less than full" time in the bath - in other words - give them a head start in the SV so they can have more time in the smoker, works even better. 

    Some people find the fall-apart SV short ribs a little disappointing because they're a bit mushy and don't have the Al dente "bite", but if you can get the best of both worlds with this process.

    And the juice from the initial SV can be a very beefy base to make a sauce.
    ______________________________________________
    I love lamp..
  • gdenby
    gdenby Posts: 6,239
    Do a search on "Thomas Keller 72 hour ribs" or variations of that. The juices will be great. An Egg or pan sear will firm up the outside, and give a fine browning. The inside will remain rare, and the bite will be sort of "popping." I suppose the muscle fibers don't collapse as much, and so the mouth feel is distinctly different than standard methods.
  • SSQUAL612
    SSQUAL612 Posts: 1,186
    Tyler, TX   XL BGE 2016, KJ Classic 2019,  MES, 18.5 WSM,  Akorn Jr,  36"&17" Black Stone, Adj Rig, Woo, Grill Grates, SS Smokeware Cap, KAB,  FB 300, Thermapen 
  • byrne092
    byrne092 Posts: 746
    edited October 2017
    Good info, thanks everyone. Still trying to decide between sous vide and braise. I know braised is solid, because I have done it before. I have heard about the "72 hour" ones, and wanted to see what the hype was about.
    I'm thinking 135 for 68-72 hours? Seems like there are endless variations of time and temp.
    @nolaegghead do you care to elaborate on your comment. I wasn't planning on smoking at all, but a sear at the end.

    Just found this video. I know it doesn't cover all the temps/times, but gives a general idea. https://www.chefsteps.com/activities/beef-short-ribs-your-way
    XL, Medium BGE & Blackstone I XAR-Woo2 & Rig-BO Flameboss 500

    St. Louis, MO
  • nolaegghead
    nolaegghead Posts: 42,109
    byrne092 said:
    Good info, thanks everyone. Still trying to decide between sous vide and braise. I know braised is solid, because I have done it before. I have heard about the "72 hour" ones, and wanted to see what the hype was about.
    I'm thinking 135 for 68-72 hours? Seems like there are endless variations of time and temp.
    @nolaegghead do you care to elaborate on your comment. I wasn't planning on smoking at all, but a sear at the end.
    If you don't plan on smoking at all and you use SV, then that SV needs to fully cook to the desired tenderness because a sear isn't going to do much in that regard.

    Here are some of the biggest problems (in my opinion) with people using SV then not being pleased with the results:

    1.  For tough meats like short ribs, people go time and temp, then consider it done.  For low and slows on the BGE, we preach time and temp is just a guideline, we check for tenderness to determine when to stop cooking.  SV is no different.  The process moves slower and is therefore more forgiving, but you should still check to see if the meat is done, and conversely, not over cook it or you'll get nasty mush.

    2.  Seasoning the bag - salt doesn't just sit mostly on the outside, with long SV it can permeate the meat.  You want to use less salt.  Spices taste different if they don't get hot, and the aromatics that normally cook off are contained in the bag and the juice.  If you add some vegetables like onions, carrots, garlic and SV under 175F, the pectin will not break down and they will be crispy.

    3.  There are different types of connective tissue in meat.  At low temps like 131F, I have noticed that some will break down, others will take much longer or not fully break down.  The meat doesn't always relax fully, and when it does, it can be mushy.  Different temps give you different combinations of texture.  You'll have to experiment to figure out what you like.
    ______________________________________________
    I love lamp..
  • byrne092
    byrne092 Posts: 746
    @nolaegghead thanks for the breakdown. I am definitely a sous vide novice; done some veggies, chicken, sweets. Wasn't a big fan of steak, much prefer using the egg for the whole process. Granted I might sing a different tune if I was tasked to cook 10+ steaks, it might sounds more appealing then. 

    I am not skeptical the sous vide can do the job, I am just unsure how to approach it. I understand that if i do 70 hours at 135ish degrees, it wont be anything like braised ribs. I would hopefully expect a very tender ribeye, maybe? Or do you go 145 for 48 hours or 72 hours. I haven't dove into the science on how the time at different temperatures truly effects the end product. The link added in above seems to have some decent info.

    I also have no desire to do them at the 130 temp that some people will do. I don't believe the fat and connective tissue would break down to what i would like.

    Well i have some thinking to do, only have a few hours if i decide to go the 72 hour route...
    XL, Medium BGE & Blackstone I XAR-Woo2 & Rig-BO Flameboss 500

    St. Louis, MO
  • I recently did a batch at 145 for 48 hours and really liked the texture - easy to pull apart, but still with good texture. They were rubbed and added a couple dashes of liquid smoke, but that didnt' come thru at all.

    I finished them direct over a really hot fire for about 1-2 minute per side to brown them off.  I took the liquid from the bag and reduced it by about half and seasoned it a bit as a gravy.  

    mmm...may have to do that again this weekend.
    1 LBGE in Chapel Hill, NC
  • nolaegghead
    nolaegghead Posts: 42,109
    Steaks that are normally cooked rare to medium rare should not be held in a sous vide bath longer than the time it takes to get to your desired temperature in the middle.  This depends on the thickness of the steak. 

    For example, a couple hours is enough for a 1.5-2" steak to heat up to 110F, which is what I do, before a hot sear.

    Don't hold anything under 130F for more than 4 hours or you will notice an unpleasant odor and there are safety concerns.
    ______________________________________________
    I love lamp..
  • byrne092
    byrne092 Posts: 746
    edited October 2017
    Yeah I think i did the steaks for like 1.5-2 hours, weren't bad, but I just liked the result the egg can produce, just better overall flavor, imo.

    OK, I am going to go with 137 for 70ish hours, give or take, which should put me at dinner time on Sunday. I will report back, hopefully the results are good!


    XL, Medium BGE & Blackstone I XAR-Woo2 & Rig-BO Flameboss 500

    St. Louis, MO
  • fishlessman
    fishlessman Posts: 34,586
    ive been cooking short ribs med/rare on the grill only and get tender results more than half the time, could be im just getting a higher quality cut as short ribs are really pricey up here. im thinking 70 hours is way to long if you are looking for a medium rare with a sousvide. that mush thing nola talked about is just terrible, did a lamb leg once you could eat with a spoon, not what you want
    fukahwee maine

    you can lead a fish to water but you can not make him drink it
  • byrne092
    byrne092 Posts: 746
    @CarolinaCrazy i am considering that as well too. Is it a knife and fork texture, or a fall/pull apart texture?
    XL, Medium BGE & Blackstone I XAR-Woo2 & Rig-BO Flameboss 500

    St. Louis, MO
  • nolaegghead
    nolaegghead Posts: 42,109
    I pull the bag out and poke and squeeze the meat (since it would create a re-bagging situation if you stabbed it with a thermapen or skewer).  You can tell how tender it is with a little experience.
    ______________________________________________
    I love lamp..
  • gdenby
    gdenby Posts: 6,239
    I haven't had "mushy" w. SV and short ribs at 72 hrs. Plate ribs don't really need the treatment, but chucks do, IMO. If done right, the SV process turns the collagen toughness to gel w/o bursting all the muscle fibers.

    Chuck roasts at 48 hours can be near steak quality. There are a couple of places where I live that sell select whole strip steak sections. 48 hours, and they are melting tender, as good as choice.

    I've had a few mush failures. For instance, a piece of pork loin I intended to serve at lunch, but had to put off till dinner, and left in the bath. Quite edible and nutritious, but glop, almost nasty, even tho seared.


  • byrne092
    byrne092 Posts: 746
    Well they are seasoned and in the bath at 135.5 right now. We shall see. 
    XL, Medium BGE & Blackstone I XAR-Woo2 & Rig-BO Flameboss 500

    St. Louis, MO
  • nolaegghead
    nolaegghead Posts: 42,109
    Looks good
    ______________________________________________
    I love lamp..
  • byrne092
    byrne092 Posts: 746
    edited October 2017
    Turned out well. Not blow your mind, this is the only way to do short ribs, but just another cook in the arsenal. Very tender, similar to a ribeye cap, but not substitute for it. The remaining good fat just melted. I think it was user error, but it didn't have a ton of flavor. I seasoned it pre sous vide and lightly again before the pan sear, but just was missing a little something. Didnt yeild a lot of meat, I just carved them up and picked out the good peices. Here's a sloppy pic to give you an idea of the meat. 
    XL, Medium BGE & Blackstone I XAR-Woo2 & Rig-BO Flameboss 500

    St. Louis, MO
  • gdenby
    gdenby Posts: 6,239
    Looks decent. Sloppy plates are as tasty as tidy ones.

    SV typically intensifies flavors, fresh garlic most notably. The sear can wipe out lots of flavor molecules. But usually there is enough fluid in the SV bag to make a good sauce.

    Where I live, good short ribs can run up to $8/lb. But rib-eye cap, rarely seen, is closer to $18. So I'd expect some difference in quality.