Welcome to the EGGhead Forum - a great place to visit and packed with tips and EGGspert advice! You can also join the conversation and get more information and amazing kamado recipes by following Big Green Egg to Experience our World of Flavor™ at:
Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Instagram  |  Pinterest  |  Youtube  |  Vimeo
Share your photos by tagging us and using the hashtag #BigGreenEgg.

Want to see how the EGG is made? Click to Watch

Fire went out during the night - 10 lb butt

Frankiesez
Frankiesez Posts: 21
edited January 2012 in EggHead Forum
I know there is an almost-identical post to this on this forum, but I have a wrinkle to add.  

This is not the first time I've had a fire go out with my egg (~2 out of 15 cooks).  But basically we hustled to get our butt rubbed (heh) and on the egg by 10pm last night.  Had the temp stabilized to 275, though it inched up to 290 here and there.  Checked it at around 11:30 and it was still at 290.  My roommate (who is not awake yet) MAAAAAY have tweaked one of the vents (bottom was open 1/8-1/2", and daisy wheel about 20-25% open) by a hair, but he knows not to mess with it too much.  

Same old story, came out this morning and the dome had a mocking "0" displayed.  felt the butt, and it was warm, also the adjustable rig was warm, but able to be touched. 

Here's my wrinkle: Not knowing what to do, I built up the fire again and got it back on.  Stabilized at around 300.  Put my probe into the meat after it was on about 20 minutes and the internal temp was around 130.  

My question is, would it have dropped into the danger zone if the internal meat temp was high enough for it to reach 130 that quickly after re-firing?  One other thing we had set up 'incorrectly' was the adjustable rig.  Instead of putting the ceramic stone on the spider down closer to the fire, we had the ceramic on the lowest level of the adjustable rig, and the food on the top rack.  This may have caused the meat to cook more quickly than most low/slow setups.  

Any thoughts?  I'd love to save the meat, but would feel horrible if I made anyone sick.  I just don't know if any bacteria could have taken hold if that meat was in the 120-130 range the whole time.  

This makes me nervous, but again, I don't think the temp of the meat dropped that much http://www.clemson.edu/extension/hgic/food/food_safety/handling/hgic3511.html


All in all, a little frustrated with the egg at the moment.  I really don't understand how this keeps happening.  Using old oak charcoal and the BGE cardboardy fire starters.  

Comments

  • egret
    egret Posts: 4,188
    The meat was definitely in the danger zone for an unknown period of time. Remember the 40*-140* is referring to the surface temp. and not the internal temp. I'd probably use it..or, at least, let my "roommate" try it first! :-))
    Seriously and strictly speaking, you should dump it........like I say, I probably wouldn't but I like to live on the edge!
    Also, don't know what you mean regarding the "0" dome reading.......my thermometer only reads "0" when the egg temp. is "0"........
  • Frankiesez
    Frankiesez Posts: 21
    edited January 2012
    @ egret, by "use" it, you mean, "lose it" right!???  This one stings....pulled pork would have been good today.  

    also, re: my "0" dome reading, that was my meaning re: the dome and egg itself...one big fat zero all around.  

    More importantly, I don't know why this happens.  We did soak our wood chips for about a half hour-45.  Some people on the other post suggested that soaking wood chips for Egg cooking only serves to make overnight fires go out.  The weird thing is, though, that the temp seemed stabilized even with wet/damp wood chips on.  (ie it didn't seem like the fire was choking).  Apparently it was.  
  • 1. Soaking wood chips serves no purpose other than introduce moisture where it isn't needed. You should spread the chips around the lump on a slow cook so that smoke is introduced throughout the cook. But they'll be dried out long before the fire gets to them.

    2. Light your fire in multiple locations. This helps if one fire area decides to burn straight down and then out.

    3. Find out if your room mate closed the vents more. A butt isn't going to be harmed by inching up to 300 degrees. Besides not having enough lump the biggest mistake people make is adjusting the vents on what was supposed to be a stabile egg before you put the meat on. It can take hours to get back up to temp with a big piece of cold meat in there.

    4. I'd toss it. You have no idea how long it was in the danger zone or if it ever got out of it in the first place. You know you'll be eating it and thinking "I hope this doesn't make me or anyone else sick".

  • gdenby
    gdenby Posts: 6,239
    The problem always comes down to not knowing how long the food was "in the danger zone." If you don't know, in food service you would be obliged to pitch it.

    I'd be inclined to think the inside of the butt was still uncontaminated, except where the temp probe went in. Any contamination during the danger time would have been on the outside. You would have to sacrifice the bark, but the inside meat should be clean. Is your hazard zero? No. I certainly would not feed it to any toddlers, elders, or someone already sick. And if you do pull it, don't save anything because that is how the contamination, if any, will spread.
  • played "Taps" on the iPad and put it in the garbage.  I've been quietly sobbing into my pillow all morning.  
  • lousubcap
    lousubcap Posts: 36,803
    Sorry to hear that but given the info, the best call.  With regard to lighting a BGE fire, I always light mine in one spot around bottom dead center usually with half a starter cube or oil soaked napkin.  For low&slows (loading lump up into the fire ring) I build up the lump around the center then light.  Once a few pieces of lump are going I build the center up to the level of the rest of the lump.  When around a soft-ball sized fire is going I load the platesetter, shut the dome and adjust the vents for the approximate temp (usually 250*F on the dome +/-).  Never lost a fire (now jinxed) and obviously don't get a straight down burn.  Works for me.
    Louisville; Rolling smoke in the neighbourhood.  Life is too short for light/lite beer!  Seems I'm livin in a transitional period. CHEETO (aka Agent Orange) makes Nixon look like a saint.  
  • Hungry Joe
    Hungry Joe Posts: 1,582
    Sorry to hear you lost your butt :-O seriously though I don't see any mention of how you built your fire. I always load my charcoal at least half way up the fire ring maybe your not starting with enough lump?
  • SteveWPBFL
    SteveWPBFL Posts: 1,327

    Guessing too much ash below the fire bowl starved the fire of oxygen.
  • stike
    stike Posts: 15,597
    frankiesez gets two for flinching.

    was nothing wrong with that butt.
    ed egli avea del cul fatto trombetta -Dante
  • Mighty_Quinn
    Mighty_Quinn Posts: 1,878
    frankiesez gets two for flinching.

    was nothing wrong with that butt.


    Especially if he would have relit the fire and finished the cook bringing the meat up to 195+...any nasties that found their way into the meat would have been killed.
  • Shiff
    Shiff Posts: 1,835
    Invest in a remote thermometer for about $60.  I love my Maverick ET732.  You can set an alarm to wake you if it goes out or gets done early.  Well worth the money just for peace of mind.
    Large BGE
    Barry, Lancaster, PA
  • stike
    stike Posts: 15,597
    edited January 2012
    mightyquinn.... sadly, not the way bacteria work.  if a piece of meat is truly funkified bacterially, you can't make it better by cooking it to 195.  bacteria would be dead, but their toxins remain.  bacteria can make you sick by multiplying in your gut (and releasing toxin) OR by poisoning you with their toxins which remain on the food after you kill them anyway.  your reheating to 190 killed them and kept them from multiplying in your gut, but you can still be sickened.

    my rationale is based on a couple things:

    1.) his meat was at 130 twenty minutes after lighting the grill again.  guess what. that 130 is LOWER than when he relit the fire.  meat will continue to lose temp after cooling just as it will gain temp when you take it off the grill.  thermal inertia in action.  toss a cooling piece of meat on a grill and it doesn't immediately about-face and rrse in temp.  you'll see the grill temp rise even as the meat temp goes down.  his meat at 130 only 20 minutes after going back on?  it didn't get to 130 by reheating quickly.  it got to 130 by cooling from some higher temp.

    2.) the danger zone rule is designed for food resting on a counter, being served, handled, etc.  not for food sitting in a sterile chamber after having been sterilized.  the USDA wants to keep it simple and memorable.  so "four hours between 40 and 140".  well, check the asterisks, and you can make it safe a number of ways, all too complicated to teach to a kid in a hairnet working for minimum wage.  the food was 'pasteurized' (yes, that's the term, not just for milk) by being held at 250 for so long.  especially when you realize that the bacteria we care about aren't just any bacteria (bacteria in general! oh! my! god!), but FECAL bacteria,  bacteria spilled from the gut (potentially) during slaughter, and which may (may) have come in contact with the exterior of the meat.  e. coli and listeria and the truly worrisome stuff are going to be found on the exterior, not the interior. and they were long gone from this dude's pork butt a few hours after midnight at latest, if there at all

    3.) bacteria from the thermometer? well....  doubtful, though hypothetically possible.  thermometers don't push stuff into meat, they push the meat aside, which would wipe it off closer to the surface.  i could see somehoe imagining it might happen, but that's a level of paranoia i would find immobilising.  if i thought that way, i'd never drive anywhere.  1 in 5000 chance i'm killed driving to go get the butt in the first place.

    4.) salt, smoke, heat are all inhospitable to bacteria.  let's say the butt was doing fine at 2 am, but somehow the fire died instantly, and the thing rocketed down to 100 degrees, allowing the dreaded "four hours of exposure between 40-140".  what bacteria exactly are there to 'reinfect' the meat?  this is why the rule usually addresses food being held at temp (like in a buffet line, where you can cough on it), but which is often ignored when the rule is quoted.   if someone slaughters a pig infected with dangerous e. coli (not just e. coli, but the bad strain, because you have e. coli on your toothbrush right now, i guarantee), and that fecal matter splattered onto your pork but at 3am while the fire was out, then i'd be worried.  otherwise? meh.  forge on.

    sure, it's wordy and a bit of a rant.  but i'm avoiding quarterly taxes, and that's my call. hahaha

    but just as my wordiness may be attacked for being too complicated, i'd say "four hours between 40 and 140' may be attacked for being too simple.  if a person can't explain WHY, then the whole "better safe than sorry" thing is a quote about ignorance, not safety.  i don't mean 'ignorance' as in stupid.  no sir.  i mean it in the sense of "well, i don't know, so i say throw it out".  tossing food in the trash is a luxury most of the world doesn't have, and is just as much a sin (to me) as feeding rotten meat to the elderly and biting your nail the whole time wondering if they'll die.  in both cases, ignorance is not bliss.


    ed egli avea del cul fatto trombetta -Dante
  • mwraulst
    mwraulst Posts: 131

    i don't have the luxury of tossing out. Hope i don't get sick, however this is the 5th or 6th butt this has happened to me on a overnight cook. I've tried everything everyone recomends as to building the fire, but i've still never had one last the full 20 hours without me touching it. This past one the fire held great for 10 hours, went to bed, woke up, dome temp at 0, opened lid and removed plate setter to find that the left side of the firebox was full of lump and the right side has burned completely down.

    I relight the fire in the am and continue to cook for 10 hours until my 20 hours elapses or 190.

    My thought is this. I rinse the pork and patt dry after removing it from the store rapping. I then smother in coarse grind dizzy pig, which contains salt. Salt, as so wonderfully described above, is no bacteria's best friend. I wrap in plastice wrap and place in fridge overnight. In my mind, surely the salt begins breaking down the meat ovenight.

    I'm certainly not saying you won't get sick, but i haven't yet, i'll keep doing it until i get sick or i can figure out how to get my medium egg to hold temp for 20 hours without going out.

    I've even heard some say if your butt doesn't hit 190 and you reheat the butt, it won't pick. Pretty sure this must be bs, because i've been able to pull mine just as easy. make sure your butt hits 190 and stabilizes and it will pick.

    Question: those of you who are intent on not soaking chunks, why? I like to soak hickory and cherry chunks in beer/redwine/apple cider. I timed the smoke exiting the daisy wheel as the exact same setting, exact same conditions and noticed that the soaked wood puts out nearly 1.5 -2 hours of more smoke exiting the top. I can't help but think thats my red wine, or beer infused wood both steaming and burning, further flavoring my butt. I could be wrong, but hey it seems to work and the taste is delicious. Just wondering the logic? If you don't soak what is your theory on green wood? Is it undesireable as well? I've always loved a little green wood for its rich smoke.

  • DIXIEDOG
    DIXIEDOG Posts: 109
    Like posted above, a remote thermometer would probably be a wise investment.  I've also got the Maverick 732 and it's nice to have low/high temp alarms go off if you're sleeping to wake you up.   I haven't had my Egg go out on an overnight cook but I also always start with a clean firebox ( I use a shop vac to remove all the ashes) and I fill my charcoal right up to the fire ring.   I also generally use  Wicked Good Weekend Warrior which doesn't produce a lot of ash and it burns a long time.  It would stink to have to throw away a  whole butt like that too often.
  • stike
    stike Posts: 15,597
    Salting beforehand is a good comment. As is washing the meat. Lots of folks don't rinse and i'm not sure why. That's where the bacteria would be (if not deboned anyway).

    Folks get skittish of the idea of meat at room temp. Yet country hams or prosciutto (same thing, differing ingredients) is often made (cured) at room temp. Slather in salt and set aside, often under weight. Sure, the concentration of salt may be higher, but it's still all on the exterior. The meat's internal temp is certainly between 40-140, and for much longer than four hours

    Mwraulst: are you flirting with much lower temps than necessary? Try 250, 275, even 300 is still low. It will run a little smoother, less likely to go out. twenty hours is nice, but not necessary.

    Sounds like you had a center burn, where the fire goes straight down ignoring the charcoal around it in a way. Dont be afraid of small lump. If the air gets past the tiny vent and lower fire grate, then even tiny bits of charcoal still provide more than enough open space for the draft

    Soaking chips and chunks isnt necessary to control whether they 'burn up too quickly' or not, because the egg controls the fire. In a gasser they could burn because the gasser isnt airtight. If it works for you though, it doesnt do any harm to soak them
    ed egli avea del cul fatto trombetta -Dante
  • mbmike
    mbmike Posts: 32

    Not that I'm an exspert or anything had my egg for well over 2years.  Currently own 3 large,small, mini.  Ive never had my fire go out during an over night cook while doing pork butts.   What type of lump charcoal were you using?  I myself get the charcoal burning around 300 plus prior to putting in the pork butts,  once the fire is nice and hot I drop a few chuncks of wood in, set the place setter in place drip pan, grill grate add the pork butts which ususally is 2 to 4 on my large.  I set the lower door around 1/2 inch, upper daisey wheel where there is a slight opening.  About 45 min later I check the temp which is closed to 200 to 240 I then close or open depending apon the temp.  I shoot for 225 to 230 and let the egg do its thing,  8 to 10 hrs later check my pork butts to see where I'm at arounf 160 to 165 I remove them wrap the in clear wrap with injection under the wrap, couple rounds of foil and return to cooker till meat gets 190.   Ive pulled them at 190 dropped in cooler for a lunch 5 hrs later and still hot to handle without gloves.  I think really if you egg wasn't clean under the lower grate it quite possible it snuffed itself out due to no air flow. just my .002

     

  • Theophan
    Theophan Posts: 2,656
    ... the food was 'pasteurized' ... by being held at 250 for so long.  ... e. coli and listeria and the truly worrisome stuff are going to be found on the exterior, not the interior. and they were long gone from this dude's pork butt a few hours after midnight at latest, if there at all...
    Gosh, you sound awfully confident, so maybe you're right and there's something I don't understand about this, but I still think it's a guess, a very reasonable guess (!), but nonetheless a guess, that the meat was pasteurized in the center.  So far as I can see, the temperature of the meat was never measured, so we don't really know for sure how long it was at what temp.  And sure, the largest concentrations of nasty bacteria do tend to be on the surface, but I've read many reports of smoked hams, for example, causing severe food poisoning because there was Staph growing in the deep part of the ham near the bone, when the temperature didn't rise fast enough that deep.  Staph seems to be pretty comfortable with salty meat, so salt doesn't always protect us.  Meat is not sterile in the middle.  Bacteria can exist throughout the animal in the tissues when it is alive!  The numbers aren't large, and that's why "steak tartare" is usually safe if handled properly.  BUT meat that indeed would be safe to eat without a long period at unsafe temperatures can become very unsafe, even un-punctured hunks of meat, if it's in a bad temperature zone for too long.

    It seems to me that the OP, and anyone he served that food to, would have faced a really very small risk, but it wouldn't have been a very small risk of catching a cold, but a very small risk if being desperately, desperately sick and maybe in the hospital.  Or if an elderly person ate it, or someone with other health risks, maybe they'd wind up dead.  For a few bucks' worth of pork, it just isn't worth it.

    Again, you sound mighty confident, so maybe you know some things I don't know!  By all means, educate me.  But at this point anyway, I think the guy was well-advised to pitch it, and I hope he did.  Chances are, it would have been fine!  But again, it's not a small risk of a minor problem; it's a small risk of a really serious illness.

    Am I misunderstanding something?

    Theo
  • mwraulst
    mwraulst Posts: 131

    i think you are theo, i think you may be too far in the overly cautious zone, possibly approaching OCD. Here's why i think this. 1st- ridiculous scenarios: Chances are he's probably not serving the pork to infants or the retirement home. Now i certainly agree with you that these individauls don't handle illness as well as the rest of us, and i'm not ruling out someone could die, but the FDA recently lowered the cooking temperature of lean pork to 145.

    Which, brings me to #2- fear

     I know a butt is not lean pork, nor actually a butt, however what i tend to see is that pork scares people for not apparent reason. If lean pork (aka loin) can be cooked to 145 safely, which is still pink in the center, whats wrong with his butt hitting 130-150, remaining warm and then him relighting the egg bringing it up to 190. Logically it makes sense that the egg is certainly not quick to cool when closed down bc the firebrick retains heat. If he had a 250-300 degree fire for 1.5 hours before going to bed and his roomie may have even checked it later, the possibility of the egg going cold in the next couple of hours should have been slight. The butt was still warm in the morning indicating that the egg remained hot well inot the early morning hours.  Chicken be very scared of undercooking, but most pork and most beef i'm not on that bandwagon. sure create scenarios where you buy meat from some guy out of his truck or  other contaminated source and the risk goes up, but i don't think its as high as you've been led to believe.

    Reason #3: Contaminated meet on the inside....

    Alright, absent of buying from ridiculous sources, how often do we hear of contaminated meet on the inside. I can think of mad cow disease and that's just about it. Again, chances aren't high, and thats the kind of things that puts a publix, bi-lo, kroger, etc. out of business. It's just not common. Use tongs, and be clean, its fairly simple.

     

    Reason #4: Staph..

    Coming from a person who's battled Staph infections for years after working as a guide on a river, i don't buy your staph infection claim. Yes i've seen the reports that tests have revealed that nearly half of all US meat contains bacteria harmful to humans, yada yada. Well if this is the truth then why aren't half of all americans getting sick? Why do people that eat medium rare or rare steaks rarely if ever get sick from the meat. Some of this bacteria is good, and needed for digestion. Sure its possible, but again, the chances are slight.

     

    All in all, his butt is in the trash, and i just ate one last night that the exact same thing happend to and it was delicious. Hate it that you tossed it, and if i were a betting man, i would have been all in on the fact that you would have been fine too.

  • Theophan
    Theophan Posts: 2,656

    ... i think you may be too far in the overly cautious zone, possibly approaching OCD. ... Chances are he's probably not serving the pork to infants or the retirement home. ... whats wrong with his butt hitting 130-150, remaining warm and then him relighting the egg bringing it up to 190. ... i don't buy your staph infection claim. Yes i've seen the reports that tests have revealed that nearly half of all US meat contains bacteria harmful to humans, yada yada. Well if this is the truth then why aren't half of all americans getting sick? Why do people that eat medium rare or rare steaks rarely if ever get sick from the meat. Some of this bacteria is good, and needed for digestion. Sure its possible, but again, the chances are slight.

    OK, first, you may be right -- no one has ever accused me of being normal! :)  And yes again, I do think I tend to go far beyond most people when I cook for groups in thinking about food safety.  And I agree again with your "chances are..."  Where I still disagree, though, is that we're not talking about a small chance of catching a cold, but a small chance of becoming terribly sick.  I don't think we actually know, do we, whether there are elderly people in his family he was thinking of serving the pork to?  So sure, "chances are" no one would have died -- you're right!  But I just don't see much point taking even a small risk of something really bad if I know a way to make that risk pretty much zero.

    And regarding, "... whats wrong with his butt hitting 130-150, remaining warm...," if he wanted to cause food poisoning, that's EXACTLY the best way he could do it!!!  If that meat slowly approached, but maybe never even hit 140, and then spent several hours "warm" and below 140, then bacteria could be multiplying like crazy, and generating toxins that later cooking won't destroy.

    And if you don't buy the staph thing, here are some specific cases of staph food poisoning in ham and, yes, pork barbecue:
    Bottom line:  I agree with you that I'm a little "odd" in how careful I try to be about food safety, but it's because I've done a lot of reading on the subject, and it's simply a fact that whether we want it to be so or not, pork barbecue, like most foods, can cause severe, even dangerous illness, if not handled properly.  What's misleading is the "chances are" thing.  Most of the time, it'll be OK even if you do it wrong.  So there are countless people out there who "know" that it's OK to do things a certain way because they've been doing it that way for years and no one ever got sick.  What they don't realize is that even if you do it wrong, it'll probably be OK most of the time.  The risk is very small, but it's not a small risk of a minor problem.  It's a small risk of something really, really bad.

    For me, if I know that something didn't go right with a chunk of pork that I had lovingly prepared and had high hopes for, that it may have spent hours at temperatures that those who study outbreaks of food poisoning and what caused them say raises the risk of food poisoning, then I know there is what probably is only a pretty small chance of making everyone who eats it terribly sick, but neither my own embarrassment about not having the promised barbecue, nor the price of a pork butt is worth taking even that small risk.

    Oh, I forgot about this part:

    Yes i've seen the reports that tests have revealed that nearly half of all US meat contains bacteria harmful to humans, yada yada. Well if this is the truth then why aren't half of all americans getting sick? Why do people that eat medium rare or rare steaks rarely if ever get sick from the meat. Some of this bacteria is good, and needed for digestion. Sure its possible, but again, the chances are slight.

    First, the differences is your words about, "... whats wrong with his butt hitting 130-150, remaining warm..."  There's a BIG difference between a steak that has a few bacteria in it, but too few to make you sick, and a piece of meat that several hours ago had too few bacteria in it to make you sick, but several hours later now has zillions of bacteria in it, and/or maybe toxins that aren't destroyed by heat.  And second, the biggest part of our disagreement may be that last thing: I agree with you that "if i were a betting man, i would have been all in on the fact that you would have been fine too," but even if the chances are "slight," it's not a slight chance of catching a cold, but a slight chance of making everyone you proudly share that 'que with really, really sick.

    Yeah, I'm probably weird, -- OK, OK, I know I'm weird :) but if my fire went out, and I honestly have no way to know how long my beautiful pork may have spent between 40 and 140, it's going in the trash.

    Theo
  • mwraulst
    mwraulst Posts: 131

    you can preach that all day long and plenty will listen chickenlittle, i however agree with this gentleman.

    stike Quote

    Posts: 13,155

    there is bacteria everywhere.  i didn't say there wasn't.  but let's understand that it is not all bad.  there are more bacteria on you right now than there are cells in your body.  that is fact. 

    additionally, your toothbrush has e. coli on it, and you let it sit out for weeks on end.

    why are you not concerned?

    well, i can tell you that you won't get sick from bacteria, even e. coli (the stuff on your toothbrush) unless it is the DANGEROUS strain, or a dangerous bacteria.  your gut is teeming with e. coli.  just not the bad strain.

    so, a chunk of meat.  yep, bacteria in the blood.  bacteria in the meat.  prosciutto is a salt cured chunk of pig which has been bled, salted, and (at least in parts of italy) pressed at ambient temp while it cures.  the interior rocking along at room temp for years, even before the salt gets a chance to reach the center and cure the meat.  there is some thinking that there are beneficial bacteria (see Harold McGee) which additionally transform the prok into 'prosciutto'.  so yeah, bacteria can exist in meat.

    but we need to understand that it is not 'all' bacteria we need to worry about.

    the bacteria of concern in slaughtered animals is that which is found not in the blood of the animal, but in th animal's gut.  if that bacteria, during slaughter,  comes into contact with the meat, that is a bad thing. 

    but it isn't going to get INTO the meat.  unless, like hamburger, you grind it.

    having typed this a bajillion times in a futile attempt to stem the panic, i'll try again.

    why is it i can eat a steak at 125 safely, but if i were to grind that steak first and then cook it, i need to cook it to 160? it's because, i will have risked mixing external bacteria (which might be from the gut of the animal) into the interior of the burger.  that bacteria would safely reside there at 125, in a burger, so i'd better cook it higher to be safe.  in a whole piece of un-molested meat, the danger is on the exterior.

    my point about this poor bastard's pork butt is that after 5, 6, seven hours in the grill, anything on the exterior is DEAD.  unless he rolls it around on some bacterially suspect killing floor, or otherwise contaminates it (puts it out on a buffet line for a typhoid carrier to cough on), his meat is fine.

    although this meat is not 'cured' in any sense, we can still aply the logic.  i can hang an uncooked leg of pork in my basement at ambient temps (right now, 70 ish) because i have taken pains to make it inhospitable to dangerous bacteria.  salt, etc.

    the lesson isn't that we need to cure a pork butt for it to be safe in the grill if the fire goes out, we need to understand whether the meat is in a state which is inhospitable to bacteria.

    let's see.

    salted (rub) on the exterior after rinsing. that's precaution one (and actually the real reason meat ever received salt and pepper to begin with, to dissuade any bacteria from getting a foothold.  and to keep away things that bring bacteria, like flies).

    put into a 250 degree environment.  well.  that exterior bacteria, whatever survived the salt, anyway, will quickly be killed off by virtue of the heat.

    smoke. not an ally of bacteria. another strike against it.

    then i look at the fact that this guy's pork was 130 when he took its temp again.  which means it was ABOVE that.  his re-lit 300 degree fire did not raise a cold piece of meat 130.  that meat was still cooling, and he found it to be at 130. it will still lose heat even in a climbing oven. 

    i don't want to brow beat anyone into eating something they don't feel safe about.  i just, personally, cannot operate willy-nilly, guessing and conjecturing. 

    after a person throws out their first chunk of pork, they should really sit down and research what the heck is going on, and don't simply take a vote from anonymous online people about whether it is safe or not.

    and they shouldn't take my less conservative advice (who the hell am i) any more than they should take the advice of anyone else, even if more conservative.

    they should know what they are doing when they do it.

    i've thrown out a couple butts in my time too.  but now i am not guessing or wishing when i do.

    as for sterilizing meat and still making it edible.  i don't know what that means.  there's a lot of excellent information out there about how food is and can be pasteurized, especially with the sous vide craze taking hold.

    food can be made ridiculously safe, if not technically 'sterile'.  again, 'bacteria' are not bad.  SOME bacteria are.

    if you do not know why you can eat an apple that's been in your fruit bowl for a week, but you will toss out a steak left on the counter for four hours, then time to so some homework.

    i cannot remember a story in recent news about a person getting sick from any whole piece of meat. it has lately been unwashed vegetables, spinach, or ground meat.  even if there were a case of someone getting sick from whole meat, it would be outnumbered by so many other stories of tomato recalls, that it is statistically far less significant.

    face it, people are afraid of what they don't understand.  and when that fear has a tiny bit of truth to it, but is otherwise not  quite accurate, the tiny bit of truth is what is clung to and pointed to, rather than the whole picture.

    witness how many more people are afraid of flying than driving in a car.  there's no underestimating the power of the human mind to misunderstand risk

    carpaccio anyone? rare steak? sunnyside eggs?

  • Theophan
    Theophan Posts: 2,656

    you can preach that all day long and plenty will listen chickenlittle, ... i cannot remember a story in recent news about a person getting sick from any whole piece of meat.

    Well, I think I've had my say, and you've had your say, and we both agree that each person must try to get the facts and make up his own mind.

    But did you see the links I offered about people getting sick from ham (whole piece of meat, and salted, to boot!) and pork barbecue (whole piece of meat, pulled after cooking)?

    Theo
  • stike
    stike Posts: 15,597
    evidence of staph infection in people whio ate barbecue at a fairground is NOT evidence that there is staph in barbecue.  it is evidence that the food was mishandled by human beings during serving.  staph a. is carried on every frigging human being walking the planet. it is on you RIGHT NOW.

    it is NOT inside a piece f pork butt.

    slice open that butt, handle it, and THEN you have staph bacteria in there.  now you need to keep that INFECTED meat at dangerous temps, and then you need to serve it to people.  that's how these people are getting sick.  not because the meat wasn't thoroughly cooked.

    simply listing a series of infections associated with food doesn't mean anything unless that list explains how the bacteria were transmitted.

    i would sooner let that meat sit all night in the cold BGE after it had hit 140, or so than i would make a sandwich out of the very same meat after it had sit out on a table in a chafing dish at a charity dinner for four hours.  same meat, two entirely different scenarios.

    people are what make the served food dangerous, not the food itself.
    granted, if that meat has dangerous bacteria on it, that's a source for contamination, but that is what propoer handling and cooking mitigate. 




    ed egli avea del cul fatto trombetta -Dante
  • stike
    stike Posts: 15,597
    edited January 2012
    those pieces of meat were cut and served.  you must teach yourself to read between the lines.  there is little to no information regarding in that cut-n-paste list of outbreaks which actually explains the transmission of the bacteria. 

    but since it's a HUMAN bacteria, it is far more likely that the meat was handled improperly while serving and holding than it was anything to do with the meat itself
    ed egli avea del cul fatto trombetta -Dante
  • Theophan
    Theophan Posts: 2,656
    those pieces of meat were cut and served.  you must teach yourself to read between the lines.  there is little to no information regarding in that cut-n-paste list of outbreaks which actually explains the transmission of the bacteria. 

    but since it's a HUMAN bacteria, it is far more likely that the meat was handled improperly while serving and holding than it was anything to do with the meat itself
    What you say makes sense, and you may be 100% right.

    For myself, though, what I see is case reports (and many more than the few I selected, and much more reading on the subject besides) where people who were experienced  BBQers with many years of cooks preparing and serving food that made people sick, even though they'd been doing it that way for years and had never made anybody sick before.  So when I see 100% of people who study food poisoning all saying the same things, I figure if I follow their recommendations, I'm really unlikely to join that group of BBQers who had never made anybody sick before.

    But you make a good case, and maybe you're right.

    Peace.

    Theo
  • fishlessman
    fishlessman Posts: 34,597
    this cooks over but i would like to point something out, its pretty much impossible to get the internals of a 10 pound  butt up to 140 at normal 220 to 250 degree pit temps, you really have to start the cook out around 300 degrees to do so, i used to watch that before understanding what the 40 140 4 hour rule was, ive heard they actually changed that rule to 2 hours now.
    fukahwee maine

    you can lead a fish to water but you can not make him drink it
  • Little Steven
    Little Steven Posts: 28,817
    Don't get him started on another dissertation....my brain hurts already

    Steve 

    Caledon, ON

     

  • stike
    stike Posts: 15,597
    lashing out now, after i wished you a happy birthday?

    it hurts when i try to be a friend.  it. hurts. so .bad.
    ed egli avea del cul fatto trombetta -Dante
  • Little Steven
    Little Steven Posts: 28,817
    I lashed out before the birthday wishes. I feel terrible about it but one can't undo what has been done

    Steve 

    Caledon, ON

     

  • stike
    stike Posts: 15,597
    ah. you are forgiven.  i can't quit you.
    ed egli avea del cul fatto trombetta -Dante