Welcome to the EGGhead Forum - a great place to visit and packed with tips and EGGspert advice! You can also join the conversation and get more information and amazing kamado recipes by following Big Green Egg to Experience our World of Flavor™ at:
Want to see how the EGG is made? Click to Watch
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | Pinterest | Youtube | Vimeo
Share your photos by tagging us and using the hashtag #BigGreenEgg.
Share your photos by tagging us and using the hashtag #BigGreenEgg.
Want to see how the EGG is made? Click to Watch
Low and Slow
Options
I love my Big Green Egg and cook a lot of ribs on it. However, I would like to have suggestions as to how to cook at a lower temp for a longer time. I have tried to close the top almost all the way and the same with the bottom inlet. I just can't seem to get it to cook lower than about 225-250. At that temp my baby back ribs are ready in about an hour. But now as fall off the bone as I would like. Any suggestions???
Thanks
Thanks
Comments
-
How have you been determining that they are "ready"?
Don -
Cooking ribs at 250 dome temp is pretty much ideal.
Unless you are pre-boiling ribs then there is no way they are ready in an hour at 250. Well, I guess if you are cooking chicken ribs then maybe, but certainly not pork or beef ribs. -
That is a good temp, but after an hour. You have barely taken the chill off, let alone be done.
Mike -
I'm with BigGreenDon, how are you determining that they are "ready." BB's should take 3 1/2-4hrs at least at 250 dome temp. Have you checked the calibration on your dome thermometer? You may be cooking at a higher temp than you think. Are you cooking indirect? :unsure:
Capt Frank
Homosassa, FL -
I have done 7 racks Memorial weekend for 3-1/2 or so . Not long enough. I did 6 racks this weekend for 6 hours , soooo much better. All at 250. Let them go . :laugh:
-
Check the calibration on your thermometer.
Cooking ribs in an hour is possible - if you are blasting them to hell. Whether they would be any good or not is a completely different question. -
i'm guessing he's grilling them direct? even then, they'd still be pretty pallid looking after only an hour i gotta think.
-
Carter, as has been mentioned, what is your criteria for "ready". If you apply a sugary sauce at the get go it could "look" ready and even begin to burn in an hour perhaps. Rib masters don't sauce until the ribs are truly tender and will bend in the middle.
-
Thanks for all the suggestions. I have been using a thermometer to put into the meat to see when it is at 165 degrees (should be done for pork). However, I will try them again and leave them on longer. I also use a drip cover I bought for my BGE (so it is cooking indirect). Also, I do not put the BBQ sauce on until the end. I'll cook em longer and try to keep the temp at about 200-225. Maybe I will replace my thermometer in my BGE.
-
-
165 is "done" by only one definition. it's cooked, but for ribs, it's way underdone.
(we'll get to why it's overdone for all the other cuts later )
ribs and butt will be done somewhere (preference varies) around a low of 185 to maybe 205. most are somewhere around 195-200.
what happens with your ribs: if you leave them in when they hit 165, they will stay around 165 for a heckuva long time, taking a long time to hit 200 or so, at which point they will be very tender.
this long time between 165 and 200 is the period when tough collagen breaks down and the meat falls apart.
pulling them at 165 means they never get tender, but are moist and "done" by some definition. what you mean by "done" is what the FDA actually refers to as "safe".
cake batter can be safe at 165, but it ain't done. -
stripstike, I enjoy your informative posts. They always add to my own knowledge base. I like the cake batter allusion. So, there you go, CarterBGE, just cook 'em longer.
-
thanks.
half of me says to just give a quick answer, half of me thinks it helps to illustrate the CONCEPT rather than just give the answer, and the third half has nothing else to do right now so might as well type it out. -
What about the 4th half?
Mike -
there are only three halves in two thirds.
-
And you wonder why we are on the metric system
Steve
Caledon, ON
-
Isnt there only one half in 2/3?
-
That's why I hate higher math :laugh: :laugh:
-
i don't know why anyone likes the metric system. they should simplify it so that everything is in simple whole, non-fractional or non-decimal numbers.
it is really confusing. for example:
why did they make it so that 1 liter = 1.05668821 quarts?
and what the heck were they thinking making 1 meter = to 3.2808 feet?
when you straighten out the metric system so that the numbers are easier to work with, you might have something -
and besides your "halves", there's also the multiple alter egos and semi-anonymous guests. hahaha Sybil would be jealous... :P
-
To quote Gram-pa Simpson:
"The metric system is the tool of the devil! My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it."
(This is approximately .002 mpg, or 10.5 feet per gallon). Yes, I drive a sherman tank. -
there are an infinite number of halves in any number
heck, there are as many numbers just between 0 and 1 as there are in the set of ALL real numbers -
-
that metric system is some screwy math. it was explained to me in canada how they got a hundred dollars of gas in my 60 dollar tank :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :ermm:fukahwee maineyou can lead a fish to water but you can not make him drink it
-
this is what they call a pork chop.
Categories
- All Categories
- 182.7K EggHead Forum
- 15.7K Forum List
- 459 EGGtoberfest
- 1.9K Forum Feedback
- 10.3K Off Topic
- 2.2K EGG Table Forum
- 1 Rules & Disclaimer
- 9K Cookbook
- 12 Valentines Day
- 91 Holiday Recipes
- 223 Appetizers
- 516 Baking
- 2.4K Beef
- 88 Desserts
- 163 Lamb
- 2.4K Pork
- 1.5K Poultry
- 30 Salads and Dressings
- 320 Sauces, Rubs, Marinades
- 543 Seafood
- 175 Sides
- 121 Soups, Stews, Chilis
- 35 Vegetarian
- 100 Vegetables
- 313 Health
- 293 Weight Loss Forum