It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Blackrazornz
Posts: 14
Hi all,
I recently bought a BGE (as in a week ago) and am trying my first pork shoulder on it today - have just cooked a few pizzas so far. From New Zealand so hopefully I haven't used any weird slang below!
I calibrated the BGE thermometer before first installing it by touching the tip to a pot of boiling water (i'm only 5m above sea level) and then adjusting the nut till it read 100C / 212F, then installed it.
I've got a Maverick ET-732 that I'm using today to monitor the cook. Currently the internal temp probe reads 32C (i.e 90F) and the chamber probe reads 105C (i.e 221F), with the chamber probe slowly climbing.
Problem is, the internal egg thermometer currently reads 145C! (293F)
Which one do I trust? I dont want to end up with a raw pork shoulder, nor do I want a blackened mess... Is it more likely I mucked up the calibration of the inbuilt thermometer, or that the Maverick probe is on the fritz? I've fried a Maverick probe via high heat on my old Weber before, but this is a new probe and seems to be giving consistent readings with no spiked etc and a slow gentle rise in heat - it's just not matching my Egg thermo!
Thanks in advance for any help.
Comments
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Off Topic Disagree 1Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeI think I just answered my own question - I had a replacement probe that I fed in through the top vent of the smoker and is just dangling in the middle of the chamber (with tin foil wrapped around the wire) and it reads 143C.. almost spot on what the BGE one does.
I'll take it that 2 similar readings mean the different one is the wrong one, so looks like I have a dud chamber probe... It's fresh out of the box too!
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeScratch that! Putting the new chamber thermometer at grill level (with the clip stuck into a Potato to hold it in place) it's now reading what the old one did.
Only rational explanation is that there is an appx 35C variance between grill level and dome level... is that a problem?
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeNope. It's common to have some difference. This seems a little on the high side but I bet they will draw closer to each other over your cook. If your butt is only 90, that will keep your grid area cooler until it comes up to temp with the dome. I bet you end up reading 10 degrees difference or so after a while
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Off Topic Disagree 1Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
3 • Off Topic Disagree 3Agree LikeThanks for all the advice, and yeh, I figured eventually to trust the grill-level Maverick
Pulled the pork off at 90C internal after 7 hours (was only a 2 pound piece of pork), came out alright for my first time ever :)
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeFrom talking over this with the ex-pat Yankees in our town*, I've pretty much set on the viewpoint that they know the rest of the planet has it right, but they stick to Imperial just to be contrary ;))
* yes, there are a fair few, I'm pretty sure a fairly large chunk of the white middle-aged Democrat voting base moved from the US to Australia or NZ during the Bush era.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Off Topic Disagree Agree 1LikeIt's not quite the killer move you think, I'd just add 273 to whatever you quote and go back to drinking beer :P
Still, if it wasn't for you guys, 'BBQ' in my country would consist of mechanically tenderised minute-steaks flash fried on a stainless steel gas grill alongside some precooked sausages and the odd piece of fish. So we gotta be nice, we owe ya :D
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeWait, minor correction - you'd have to subtract 273 and the Fahrenheit folks would be left with Celsius (nnoooo more math!). Next sous vide project - short ribs in a Bose-Einstein condensate. Macroscopic condensate phenomena's effect on Dizzy Pig rubs...
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeNah, I meant Kelvin temps work on the same scale as Celsius, they just start 273 behind (273.15 to be exact), so 0C is 273K, 150C is 423K, etc etc, easy conversion, just add 273 to the K to get C :)
I suspect before my time is done I'll be able to do a thesis on "Chaos Theory in a Barbecue Environment : A Study of Mean and Average Temperatures Required to Obliterate Sensor Probes on the Maverick ET-732 - with concordance"
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Off Topic Disagree 1Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeMy new homemade Sous vide PID controller reports temps in C, so I've downloaded a Iphone app to convert over to F just so my brain can handle it.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like:))
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like