Welcome to the EGGhead Forum - a great place to visit and packed with tips and EGGspert advice! You can also join the conversation and get more information and amazing kamado recipes by following Big Green Egg to Experience our World of Flavor™ at:
Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Instagram  |  Pinterest  |  Youtube  |  Vimeo
Share your photos by tagging us and using the hashtag #BigGreenEgg.

Want to see how the EGG is made? Click to Watch

Slow Roast Lamb Shoulder - didn't work as expected

Options
TheManOnTheBus
TheManOnTheBus Posts: 36
in Lamb

Hi

I am new to Pit cooking, but would normally cook a lamb shoulder in the oven at a low (130C/260F) for 4 or so hours.  It would normally come out meltingling soft ("pulled lamb") and carveable with a spoon.  I wouldn't normally use a thermometer to measure interior of meat, it always unfailingly works.

I tried to replicate in the Pit.  Went for temperature of 130C/260F.  Indirect. I read on a website to stop cooking when the internal temperature got to 78 C/170F. 

This took around 4 hours to get to that temperature so thought - all good!

However, it wasn't soft.  Perfectly edible (indeed, tasty), but needed to be sliced with a knife and didn't "pull".  so not quite what I wanted.

Any ideas why not?  I could have carried on but though the internal temp would get hotter and hotter and meat would dry out.

What would have happened if I had continued for another hour or so?

Thanks in advance from an Egg novice.

TMOTB

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • lousubcap
    lousubcap Posts: 32,378
    Options
    Never have cooked that protein, but given what you describe, I'm guessing you declared victory too soon.  The texture you described (pulled lamb) gets that way after a complete rendering of all the fat and connective tissue.  Not sure how fatty the meat was going in so I could be way off-base here.  
    But to get pulled pork or beef you have to cook until they probe like buttah, normally in the low 200's*F. FWIW-
    BTW-welcome aboard and continue to enjoy the journey you have embarked upon.  Wish I could be more definitive-I'm sure someone with more knowledge will be along.
    Louisville; Rolling smoke in the neighbourhood. # 38 for the win.  Life is too short for light/lite beer!  Seems I'm livin in a transitional period.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • buzd504
    buzd504 Posts: 3,824
    Options
    Yep, generally to have meat that "pulls", you want to be around 200.
    NOLA
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Botch
    Botch Posts: 15,487
    Options
    But does lamb have a lot of collegen to melt at 200F?  A beef steak doesn't, which is why it's tender at 125F, but shoe leather at 200F.  
    _____________

    "Pro-Life" would be twenty students graduating from Sandy Hook next month  


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • buzd504
    buzd504 Posts: 3,824
    Options
    I would think a shoulder would, but I've never cooked one.
    NOLA
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheManOnTheBus
    TheManOnTheBus Posts: 36
    Options

    Yes, a shoulder I think would - it does "melt" when cooked in a conventional oven.

    Thanks, All, I should have persevered!

    Is there a recommended website for joints/internal temps chart.

    etc


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Hans61
    Hans61 Posts: 3,901
    Options
    I'm guessing if the lamb "pulled" it had fat and connective tissue. Might want to get a grate thermometer, if you were going by dome temp it could have been 20 or so degrees less than you wanted. Welcome aboard! 
    “There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body.”
    Coach Finstock Teen Wolf
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Acn
    Acn Posts: 4,424
    Options
    Hans61 said:
    I'm guessing if the lamb "pulled" it had fat and connective tissue. Might want to get a grate thermometer, if you were going by dome temp it could have been 20 or so degrees less than you wanted. Welcome aboard! 
    I would bet this is the culprit - the difference between some and grate temps.  The lamb was probably cooking at 240-245, rather than 260.  Those results sound very similar to pork shoulder at those ITs, 170-180 you'll get very tasty sliced pork, but you need to take it north of 195 to get pulled pork.

    Next time I'd go by feel, when your thermometer slides in without resistance, it'll be pulled and delicious.

    LBGE

    Pikesville, MD

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dldawes1
    dldawes1 Posts: 2,208
    Options
    TheManOnTheBus...First Welcome to the eggdiction !!!!

    Second....Thanks for posting. I've only egged rack of lamb once , and it came out perfect. I wondered what would happen if I let the IT raise higher, but I was afraid to try.

    I want to learn more about lamb...so hopefully some more folks will jump in on your thread.

    Thanks again,

    Donnie

    Donnie Dawes - RNNL8 BBQ - Carrollton, KY  

    TWIN XLBGEs, 1-Beautiful wife, 1 XS Yorkie

    I'm keeping serious from now on...no more joking around from me...Meatheads !! 


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheManOnTheBus
    TheManOnTheBus Posts: 36
    Options

    Thanks, all.  All good tips to a novice!  Sounds like I should have persevered and waited til IT got to 195 (rather than stop at 170). 

    Thanks for the welcome, Donnie. Shoulder of lamb is much fattier than Rack of Lamb.  (I am in the UK, and I know that US terminology can be different, but I assume we mean the same by "rack": http://www.bbc.co.uk/food/lamb_rack.)  Whilst I am a novice at this type of cooking, Rack of Lamb would definitely be direct grill (served pink).

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Darby_Crenshaw
    Darby_Crenshaw Posts: 2,657
    Options
    You can also roast rack of lamb. Doesn't have to be direct grilled
    [social media disclaimer: irony and sarcasm may be used in some or all of user's posts; emoticon usage is intended to indicate moderately jocular social interaction; the comments toward users, their usernames, and the real people (living or dead) that they refer to are not intended to be adversarial in nature; those replying to this user are entering into a tacit agreement that they are real-life or social-media acquaintances and/or have agreed to or tacitly agreed to perpetrate occasional good-natured ribbing between and among themselves and others]

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • fishlessman
    fishlessman Posts: 32,759
    Options
    ive done pulled lamb from the leg which folks here said it wouldnt work, it does =) with that shoulder at 170 internal, you need to foil and continue the cook to 205/210 internal and adding a braising liquid doesnt hurt, it doesnt need much. (is there a braising liquid when you do it in the oven). im not a fan of pulled lamb and prefer it raw to rare but it does and will pull, it pulls more like pulled beef chuck
    fukahwee maine

    you can lead a fish to water but you can not make him drink it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bigbadben
    bigbadben Posts: 397
    Options
    I would check your oven temp with a thermometer. Many home ovens can be off my 50 F. That is the only thing I can think of to explain this. 

    experiment 2. 2 lamb shoulders. One inside, one outside. 

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Categories