For the Actuarials...years you have left...probably

Braggart

I was reading an interesting piece on what life was like 100 years ago, and stumbled across this life expectancy simulation.   

The simulation is geared towards what "range" you can expect to live beyond, based on average life expectancies in the US. 

Shame there isn't an input for barbecuing with good food and friends.   

Enjoy

http://flowingdata.com/2015/09/23/years-you-have-left-to-live-probably

Botch

Interesting read!  The author touched on, but didn't fully spell out, a curious tidbit: 150 years ago the average lifespan in the US was only in the 30's, but if you removed all the "infant mortality" deaths (a term actually used by us Reliability Engineers), deaths between 0 and 5 years, then the average jumps up into the 50s.  Child health care and immunizations made all the difference.  
 
I also chuckled at the inclusion of getting our driver's license, and old enough to buy beer.  

Braggart

Zmokin

Botch said:

Interesting read!  The author touched on, but didn't fully spell out, a curious tidbit: 150 years ago the average lifespan in the US was only in the 30's, but if you removed all the "infant mortality" deaths (a term actually used by us Reliability Engineers), deaths between 0 and 5 years, then the average jumps up into the 50s.  Child health care and immunizations made all the difference.  
 
I also chuckled at the inclusion of getting our driver's license, and old enough to buy beer.  

That is a very good point.  Shows how statistical information  can be misleading when one doesn't know all of the facts behind the statistical number.and while I am not a "Reliability Engineer", as an Electronics Engineer, I am well aware of the bathtub curve for failure rates.  Infant mortality vs. end of life.