Over a thousand responses?

morrobayrich

Of what purpose is including posts with in excess of 1000 responses on the Forum list?  It seems any post with more than 200 responses should be diverted to a separate area as it gets exceedingly difficult to read the most recent posts.

tarheelmatt

I would be "devastated" if that happened.....

Legume

well, if it's on the front page or two, it's active, people are adding to it - it's a conversation.  if it's not active, then it sinks.  I don't see the value in having a number of responses cutoff.  beyond page 2 and is about the same as diverting it

saluki2007

tarheelmatt

At a whopping 49 glorious posts, they sure are bossy.... 

mgd_egg

This post is bound to reach 1000 responses. 

johnkitchens

It is a popularity contest. The most popular posts stay on the front. 

Acn

mgd_egg said:

This post is bound to reach 1000 responses. 

Yep, I bet this is gonna get popular when folks start drinking.

Ozzie_Isaac

If you start a thread and get over 1000 responses then you get 10% of your next EGGcessory purchase.

Its in the rules.

buzd504

I always thought they should put all the responses in a single thread.  Clicking through all these different topics is annoying and time consuming.

Legume

buzd504 said:

I always thought they should put all the responses in a single thread.  Clicking through all these different topics is annoying and time consuming.

that's f'n brilliant  - it would be just like all of the voices in my head, totally unfiltered with no organization at all.

Ozzie_Isaac

HendersonTRKing

Spaightlabs

Anything past 10 responses is bound to just be restating what has already been said before.  Anything over 10 posts and get rid of it.

Ozzie_Isaac

Anything past 10 responses is bound to just be restating what has already been said before.  Anything over 10 posts and get rid of it.

NCEggSmoker

+1

Legume

Spaightlabs said:

Anything past 10 responses is bound to just be restating what has already been said before.  Anything over 10 posts and get rid of it.

you, sir, are response 13

henapple

Bump

theyolksonyou

I'll see your bump and raise you a bump to be named later. 

henapple

Ozzie_Isaac

Fred19Flintstone

johnkitchens

Fred19Flintstone said:

Nice bump. 

JohnInCarolina

Spaightlabs said:

Anything past 10 responses is bound to just be restating what has already been said before.  Anything over 10 posts and get rid of it.

Clearly you haven't seen Travis' brisket thread.

DMW

I came right to my sons baseball game from the airport. I was planning to give my liver the night off tonight, but there are so many tempting threads up and running now that need to get to 1000 posts.

lousubcap

There is a big difference between "views" and "comments".   I'm all for the open forum and you never now where a thread will go.  I am with @tarheelmatt- you never know when "Devastated" will surface again.  And you can view, comment or pass.  YMMV-

Chubbs

JohnInCarolina said:

Spaightlabs said:

Anything past 10 responses is bound to just be restating what has already been said before.  Anything over 10 posts and get rid of it.

Clearly you haven't seen Travis' brisket thread.

The one where he boils it? @travisstrick

Chubbs

morrobayrich said:

Of what purpose is including posts with in excess of 1000 responses on the Forum list?  It seems any post with more than 200 responses should be diverted to a separate area as it gets exceedingly difficult to read the most recent posts.

If it bothers you then don't click on the thread. Click clack

stevesails

I'll contribute.   

Ozzie_Isaac

NPHuskerFL

Bump!
https://youtu.be/h5sX24usBvQ